• aleph@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    As if there were any doubt about the Israeli government’s disregard for human rights, you have members of the Likud party openly saying that anyone held in detention (without trial) in the Sde Teiman concentration camp is a terrorist and therefore “anything can be done to them”, including torture and rape.

    Twitter Link to Video

    I assume the US State Department will surely note this as evidence of war crimes and take appropriate action…

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    How dare the military police arrest soldiers for committing crimes!

    one good action by the MP and of course the racist crazies run to the streets

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    3 months ago
    Al Jazeera Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

    Al Jazeera is rated with Medium Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: Mixed
    Country: Qatar
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/al-jazeera/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News:
    - https://ground.news/find?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aljazeera.com%2Fnews%2F2024%2F7%2F29%2Fisraeli-far-right-politicians-protest-arrest-of-soldiers-suspected-of-abuse


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Please not MBFC is biased garbage.

      MBFC’s biggest criticism of Al Jazeera?

      Al Jazeera also has an opinion page that exhibits significant bias against Israel. In this article, the author uses highly negative emotional words as evidenced by this quote: “Europe is increasingly sharing Israel’s racist approach to border security and adopting its deadly technologies.” This article, however, is properly sourced from credible media outlets. Another article, “How many more ways can Israel sentence Palestinians to death?” also uses loaded language that is negative toward Israel. Further, the opinion page does not favor US President Donald Trump through this article: ‘Barbed wire-plus‘: Borders know no love. In general, opinion pieces are routinely biased against Israel and right-wing ideologies.

      MBFC only approves IDF mouthpieces.

        • Alteon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          The Opinion section of a newspaper should not be accounted in how “Factual” the reporting of a news agency is. I’m not sure why that would even be relevant…

          • Timii@biglemmowski.win
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            The opinion section reveals the bias of the author and if that author writes news articles, guess what, that bias transfers. Ones biases do not simply vanish on a whim.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because I have a brain and understand being critical of Israel is not a detriment to a newspaper.

          • Timii@biglemmowski.win
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            3 months ago

            As a perfect example, your obvious bias strongly influences readers evaluation of your opinion. Guess what mine is.

                • zazo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Ok let’s be pedantic then

                  The judges had stressed they did not need to say for now whether a genocide had occurred but concluded that some of the acts South Africa complained about, if they were proven, could fall under the United Nations’ Convention on Genocide.

                  Israel isn’t convicted of committing genocide, yet as there’s only “a plausible risk of genocide” - and I’m sure the “defense” minister calling for the starvation of all people in Gaza and referring to them as “human animals” will do wonders for Israel’s case…

                  The current ruling is that “Israel must take all measures to prevent genocidal acts in Gaza” - which is an interesting statement to make if the ICJ thought no genocidal acts were happening.

                  But hey innocent until proven guilty right - I just hope if it does get proven you’ll be the first one to start shouting how Israel is committing genocide - the same way you’re currently doing the opposite - as that would show your true lack of bias…