Hello World, As many of you have probably noticed, there is a growing problem on the internet when it comes to undisclosed bias in both amateur and professional reporting. While not every outlet can be like the C-SPAN, or Reuters, we also believe that it’s impossible to remove the human element from the news, especially when it concerns, well, humans.

To this end, we’ve created a media bias bot, which we hope will keep everyone informed about WHO, not just the WHAT of posted articles. This bot uses Media Bias/Fact Check to add a simple reply to show bias. We feel this is especially important with the US Election coming up. The bot will also provide links to Ground.News, as well, which we feel is a great source to determine the WHOLE coverage of a given article and/or topic.

As always feedback is welcome, as this is a active project which we really hope will benefit the community.

Thanks!

FHF / LemmyWorld Admin team 💖

  • Rooki@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
    1667·
    5 months ago

    Ok then tell me an alternative we can use in the scale for free.

    None? Then pls dont just complain complain complain… And dont suggest improvements.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auEnglish
      495·
      5 months ago

      You don’t.

      There doesn’t exist a site to magically do what you want.

      Likewise it’s not needed. It doesn’t add to the quality of discussion on the community. All it’s going to do is cause conflict as we now have to constantly point out to people how garbage the source is so that they don’t let it influence them.

    • Maalus@lemmy.worldEnglish
      26·
      5 months ago

      Boooo. Running a community as a mod-dictator and not being able to hear feedback and react to it like an adult. Just because you thought of something, doesn’t mean it is a good idea or that people will like it. The approach of “better than nothing” is naive and plain wrong - misinformation isn’t “better than nothing” it actively hurts the community.

      • Rooki@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
        230·
        5 months ago

        No we dont. We saw the expected “ReMoVe ThE BoT” comments, because MBFC did hurt their feelings by not rating their favourite newspage the highest creditability on earth.

        And just block it, then you can imagine how it is without the bot.

        • AhismaMiasma@lemm.eeEnglish
          202·
          5 months ago

          I don’t care what it rates a particular news page, I care that you’re treating this as an objective/unbiased authority on truth that you feel needs to be communicated on every single post.

          You could take a moment to reflect on all of the responses you’ve received, but your comments make it clear that you don’t value other perspectives.

    • nia_the_cat@lemmy.worldEnglish
      16·
      5 months ago

      Seeing as this is the stance the admins stance on decisions that are majority hated by the community, I’m just gonna leave this instance and go to one with admins that are more user-focused.

      I expect community leaders to take reasonable feedback from the community respectfully even if they disagree, rather than doubling down on very unpopular decisions. Especially when said community funds the platform.

      The majority of the bots posts have more downvotes than upvotes. The community has voiced its dislike for this bot as a majority.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.eeEnglish
      1234·
      5 months ago

      I find the only people that say MBFC is biased, are just saying they themselves have biased opinions so they don’t agree with the MBFC rating

      I’m 1000% with you on this