Assuming there’s nothing stopping you from legally voting

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ah yes the classic, “i cant decide between voting for fascism or against it. Really tough choice”

    • Towwebbed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      OP wants to know why people don’t vote. If you believe in voting you’re probably not going to like any of the answers but they shouldn’t be downvoted for answering the question as asked.

    • EABOD25@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hey. I’m trying to turn over a new leaf on social media. In situations like this, I will be absolutely serious, direct, and respectful. Regardless of if you disagree with my view, I politely ask the same thing. We need to talk to each other with respect regardless of our views. Agreed?

      • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ok I will rephrase to be polite and respectful.

        When you are presented with the option of voting for or against fascism, what makes that choice difficult?

        • papalonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ll continue to say this question still isn’t being asked in good faith.

          Of course the ballot isn’t literally, “do u want fascism or nah”

          It’s between two politicians. You and I are agree that one side is almost inherently better than the other, but you have to remember that a. the other side also believes that they are inherently better than the other, and b. not everyone believes that either side is inherently better than the other.

          Judging by your comments I’m assuming you’re pro-choice; if someone asked you, “when presented with the choice of outlawing the murder babies, what makes that choice difficult for you?”, you’d rightfully say they aren’t posing the question in a fair way to you. It’s the same thing here, if you’re trying to communicate with someone who doesn’t outright agree with you you can’t just outright attack their position or frame it in a negative light or you just make them defensive and not receptive to an alternative view.

          • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Of course the ballot isn’t literally, “do u want fascism or nah”

            This specific election is literally just this

            • papalonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              If you’re speaking hyperbolically, sure. But when you’re trying to have a genuine conversation with someone regarding a serious topic, using hyperbolic speech to belittle someone’s position is pretty lame

              • arality@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                If you’re speaking hyperbolically, sure.

                They are not. If trump wins many people will die. And he will be the new forever king of America.

                • papalonian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Ok, but LITERALLY, the ballot says Donald Trump or Joe Biden. HYPERBOLICALLY it says fascism or not. Words don’t just mean whatever we want them to mean, and if someone isn’t already on board with Trump = fascism (which, don’t get me wrong, I’m 100% on that boat), phrasing things in pointed, biased ways isn’t going to convince them that we’re the side of reason.

                  • arality@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    phrasing things in pointed, biased ways isn’t going to convince them that we’re the side of reason.

                    There is literally no way to reason these people out of the position they didn’t reason themselves into. I’m of the firm belief that we need to be heckling, calling out, and generally being as rude and mean as possible to Nazis. Make the fuckers squirm back into their hole.

              • rezifon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’ve voted in every election since Bush senior in 1988 and I do not believe the other guy is speaking hyperbolically at all. It’s so different this time. It truly is.

                • papalonian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I feel like everyone that is arguing with what I’ve said thinks that I don’t agree that a Trump presidency will result in a huge increase in fascist ideology. It will be absolutely terrible if the man gets elected again and it absolutely will have drastic consequences to the US government.

                  This does not change the fact that LITERALLY, the ballot is between Biden and Trump, not between Fascism and Not-Fascism.

                  If someone is on the fence about something and you talk to them like there’s only one logical option (even if there is only one logical option), the immediate reaction will almost be a defensive one, and rarely will they be persuaded to your way of thinking. Like the abortion example I gave above; if you were on the fence about abortion, and someone asked you if you thought murder was wrong, that would be a fair sign that they aren’t presenting a good-faith discussion, and just want to brow-beat you in to their opinion. If you ask someone who (somehow) hasn’t paid attention to politics in the last decade if they want to let [presidential candidate] turn the country into [bad thing], you’re not opening a fair discussion, even if it’s most likely true that the outcome you describe is the one we will see.

              • Fades@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                You are as pathetic as your weak defense of abandoning your most important civic duty. Your weakness hurts us all. Shame on you.

                • papalonian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I… What? I think you’ve got me mistaken for someone else bud, I’ve voted in every election I could since I was 18, what civic duty have I abandoned? And where did I defend anything?

        • EABOD25@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s not a difficult choice at all because, you said it yourself; voting for or against when I already stated that I would vote for no one because we as a nation have put people in power that have the authority to supercede our vote. It’s not a left or a right thing. It’s not a democracy or fascism thing. It’s a fact that every single American has to contend with because WE as American citizens allowed it to happen. Isn’t that democracy?

      • Jikiya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        The one that wants to overthrow democracy and would like to fund the ethnic cleansing at an even higher rate/amount is the fascist. The one that has encouraged Israel to go faster / do more in Gaza is the fascist. I do not like Biden’s weakness confronting Israel, but one is a cheerleader, and one is weakly pushing for caution.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Giving Israel the means to continue ethnic cleansing is more than cheerleading. Not that it would be acceptable if he were just cheering it on.

          There’s no evidence that Trump can do anything that Biden already isn’t already, barring sending American soldiers to participate in the genocide which I doubt would be politically feasible for him. Israel doesn’t need our soldiers, they do need our bombs though, which Biden has provided without any effective conditioning.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Kinda telling of how poor of a choice the Democratic candidates have been that they can’t or can barely sway enough votes in their favor when this is on the line.