• n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure he’s “learned” anything. Good article otherwise!

    • Dienervent@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      103
      arrow-down
      56
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good article?

      The comments that formed the basis of the complaints against Dr. Peterson included comments on a podcast in which he commented on air pollution and child deaths by saying “it’s just poor children…”

      This quote is the most disgusting out of context character assassination I’ve seen in a long time.

      I got suspicious because while Jordan does say things that women and/or trans people often find deplorable. I know that he’s a strong supporter of the poor (at least in rhetoric) and as a family man I assume of children as well.

      The full context can be found on Spotify. Episode #1769 of “The Joe Rogan Experience” start from about 15:30. He’s the one that brings up how 7 million poor children die from indoor particulate pollution. Joe doesn’t believe him and gets a fact check, which eventually leads to Jordan sarcastically saying “Well, it’s just poor children, and the world has too many people on it anyway…”

      It’s such an insane mischaracterization of what he said, you can’t take the article seriously. Probably would have to write off the entire website that article is from, honestly.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        89
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think Jordon Peterson is a giant pile of shit, but you’re being downvoted for calling out a shitty article for misrepresenting obvious sarcasm, and that’s bullshit. Misinformation is misinformation regardless of whether or not it confirms our bias, if the Fediverse community doesn’t want to learn this it has no business pointing at misinformation on other platforms like Reddit.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          How can we expect anyone to critically examine the media they consume if we fail to do the same when it suits us? Peterson is a flaming pile of pseudo-intellectual garbage, but there’s plenty of ways to prove that without intentionally taking sound bites out of context.

          That and body shaming people you don’t like really aggravate me. Shit humans do shit things, attack that and leave the rest alone.

          • mommykink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The double-standards on body shaming drive me up the wall on this website. The number of “ugly, fat, small penis” comments I see from the same people who say you can’t call a medically obese person “obese” is insane to me.

            • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The number of “ugly, fat, small penis” comments I see from the same people who say you can’t call a medically obese person “obese” is insane to me.

              Cite one of your many examples of being unable to call a medically obese person “obese” because of objections from people engaging in body shaming.

        • nicktron@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          38
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, he’s being downvoted because he’s adjacently defending JP. If you don’t know how JP is human garbage at this point, and you’re willing to come to articles to defend him, you’re a fan. And therefore, a twat.

          Edit: yes the article is BS but that doesn’t change what he’s selling.

          • ikidd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Correcting dishonesty is defending someone.

            What a load of shit.

            • kazakhspy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, in the other comment he then went even further beyond and actually did started to defend JP. So, you know, I guess he was right in calling him out in the end :p

            • nicktron@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You know just as well as I do that he’s cherry picking the article for inaccuracies to defend JP. Nobody is defending the article ffs.

              Yea the article is shit, we already established that (and I don’t recall anyone stating otherwise in our exchanges). That’s not what we are talking about. If you continue to make it about that, you’re just as much of a twat as the idiot above.

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              It is if you’ve already made up your mind that Jordan Peterson, for example, is a piece of shit and therefore nothing anyone says about the matter really matters anymore.

              The people downvoting him already made up their minds. They already came to the conclusion they think is correct, and so debate is no longer needed. To them, you’re needlessly drawing out an argument that has long since ended in their favor, and why would anyone do that unless they had an ulterior motive?

              That’s how they think. They’re not really wrong; whether they’re upvoting misinformation or not really IS irrelevant to the grander question and that grander question is whether JP is a fraud, and to them that answer is unequivocally yes, debate over.

              Don’t waste your time arguing with them. Their battle lines have already been drawn.

          • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            No matter how much of a wanker Peterson is, and I agree he is one. You should always be wary of misinformation. By spreading something so easily disproved because it feels right, you just give him ammunition to argue that people are lying and defaming him when defending himself. The bloke has said tons of stupid stuff worth criticism, focus on them.

          • Nelots@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            What the hell were they supposed to say? Should they have agreed that the article was good just because JP is a PoS? Despite the clear and disgusting BS inside it? Is that really what you want?

            Misinformation is misinformation and needs to be cleared up, no matter who the target is.

            • Dienervent@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know how to reach these people or whether they’re reachable at all. Yes, my main motivation by a very long shot was to correct absurd levels of misinformation in a community where I believe most members care about not spreading misinformation.

              What worries me is that so many people seem to be living in an echo bubble that’s radicalizing them to hate people they shouldn’t be hating.

              So yes, there’s a lot of not so great things about Jordan Peterson. But all things considered he’s not that bad. And I haven’t paid attention closely for the last few years, but I wouldn’t be characterizing him as a piece of shit.

              The author of the article is a worse piece of shit than Jordan Peterson. People who seem to take pleasure out of Jordan’s suffering due to his Benzodiazepine addiction are even worse.

              But, looking at some of Jordan’s twitter comment, he’s definitely a bit of an asshole. But 95% of people seem to be assholes when they go on twitter.

              The only really bad thing about him is his political views. But even there, there seems to be less malice and less self serving talk than most right wingers (other than the apparent or effective grifting). But even the grifting, in my opinion, is not as bad as most people (both on the left and on the right). Still, right wing ideology is a very problematic from a liberal perspective (which is my perspective). But at the same time today’s mainstream and increasingly radical left ideology is also problematic from a liberal perspective. Regardless, I still don’t think that someone’s anti-liberal social views necessarily makes them a piece of shit regardless of if they’re on the left or on the right. But it does make it easy to become one.

              • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sorry but I have to vehemently disagree. I find this views on transgender people abhorrent. He misgenders and deadnames people out of spite and disguises it as intellectual honesty.

                His views on the role of women are outdated as hell, he disparages the humanities despite his participation in them, promotes toxic masculinity, and is a climate change denier. He holds all these views while wearing a mask of impartiality and aloofness, but his talking points are no different from and scarcely better supported than any other bigot’s.

                So while I am against misinformation, I still feel quite confident in calling him a piece of shit as I believe he promotes hateful and backwards ideals.

      • DessertStorms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        he’s a strong supporter of the poor (at least in rhetoric)

        “Well, it’s just poor children, and the world has too many people on it anyway…”

        Never mind how laughable that first quote is, it is inherently incompatible with the second, since the entire Malthusian myth is based in classist eugenics

        https://usfblogs.usfca.edu/sustainability/2023/04/20/overconsumption-not-overpopulation-debunking-the-overpopulation-myth-and-eco-fascism/

        https://www.theworldmind.org/home/2021/12/10/the-dangerous-myth-of-overpopulation

        https://www.globaljustice.org.uk/blog/2019/03/how-racist-myths-built-population-growth-bogey-man/

        Imagine still jumping to the defence of this bigoted useless grifter… 🤦‍♀️😂

      • kazakhspy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am sorry, but I dont understand where is the misinformation? The article doesnt state nor imply that JP has said that poor children deserve to die. It stated, that that particular comment was used in a complaint against him in court. So if you are upset at the people who formed the complaint then thats fair. But why be mad at the article? They only stated what has happened, unless I misunderstood?

      • JTode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is why I’ve kinda stopped consuming other people’s political writing, and only shitcomment about it. People of all stripes cannot resist the urge to make the story just a liiiiiitle better.