At least 274 Palestinians were killed and 698 wounded in Israeli strikes on the Nuseirat refugee camp in central Gaza, Gaza’s health ministry said on Sunday. The Israeli military said its forces came under heavy fire during the daytime operation.

The EU’s top diplomat, Josep Borrell, called it a “massacre”, while the UN’s aid chief described in graphic detail scenes of “shredded bodies on the ground”.

“Nuseirat refugee camp is the epicentre of the seismic trauma that civilians in Gaza continue to suffer,” Martin Griffiths said in a post on X, calling for a ceasefire and the release of all hostages.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Where else would it be safe to hold the hostages? The rest of the area is getting bombed to oblivion. Most of the hostages are probably under rubble.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I doubt the hostages would survive a sponge bomb, you know, the kind the IDF uses to clear tunnels (they built).

            • fukhueson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              So you’re saying it might be a good idea to make known certain safe zones for hostages and not turn those into battle grounds? Who is that incumbent on?

              Also, aa is Turkish state media and not trustworthy.

              https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/anadolu-agency/

              A Bellingcat article states that “AA as a whole can only be considered as blatant and deliberate twisting and distorting of the facts.”

              In review, Anadolu Agency utilizes moderately loaded emotional language in their headlines, such as “Merkel slams Trump for ‘harming’ global order” and “Erdogan slams world for ‘failure’ in Jerusalem test.” Anadolu Agency also poorly sources as they typically source by heavily quoting without linking to the actual story.

              Overall, we rate Anadolu Agency Right Biased editorially and Mixed factually due to poor sourcing. Further, this is an agency controlled by the right-wing ruling party and has a very strong pro-government state bias. (M. Huitsing 5/25/2018) Updated (11/10/2023)