For those unfamiliar, GrapheneOS is a privacy and security enhanced custom ROM endorsed by Snowden. Despite these big names, plenty of people give it backlash

Even @TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml gives it backlash despite being a moderator of Lemmy’s biggest privacy community. A quote here: “grapheneOS trolls are downvoting every single post and comment of mine, and committing vote manipulation on Lemmy. They are using 5-6 accounts.” That was in response to downvotes on a comment posted in the c/WorldNews community, which is entirely unrelated to technology.

One of the reasons is that GrapheneOS can only be installed on Google Pixels due to security compatibility, which makes complete sense considering Android should be most compatible with Google’s own devices. GrapheneOS even lists the exact reasons they chose Pixels, and encourage people to step up and manufacture a different supported device.

One year ago, Louis Rossmann posted this video outlining his reasons for deleting GrapheneOS. Mainly, he had multiple bad experiences with Daniel Micay (the founder and main developer of GrapheneOS) which put his distrust in the GrapheneOS project. Since then, he has stepped down and will no longer be actively contributing to the project.

So, I am here to learn why exactly people still do not like GrapheneOS.

  • Charger8232@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    28 days ago

    I have wondered why they haven’t taken the opportunity to come out with a Graphene-lite for non-Pixels

    The issue I see is simply a lack of developers to do so. Trying to split the team between two mostly different projects would most likely cripple both.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      28 days ago

      They tell you why right on their website. They dev for Pixels because it’s a stable platform with a predictable future.

      If you’re not going to listen to the devs, I don’t know what to say.

    • lucasmz ∞@hachyderm.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      @Charger8232 @DARbarian I don’t think that’s it, it’s more that they’re a project where you’re expected to buy a device for it, in this case a Pixel.

      Pixels have amazing security features and they don’t want to lose that.

    • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      I think the issue is Play Integrity/SafetyNet. If you can’t lock the bootloader, you can’t get it without using illegal hacks. GrapheneOS only passes Basic Integrity but that’s just details