Tests later concluded that the digit belonged to a “living human being” who authorities contacted and was “given full medical support,” the source said.
seems to mean that the sender of the finger, and the person to whom the finger belonged to are 2 separate people.
Wait, was the person who sent the finger the original owner of the finger, or someone else? The article isn’t clear.
combined with
seems to mean that the sender of the finger, and the person to whom the finger belonged to are 2 separate people.
Surely the could do it digitally?
I see what you did there…
That’s fucking weird.
Was the finger giving willingly?
Unless the victim was Peter Pettigrew, I highly doubt
And did the original owner consent to their finger being used in such a way?