• Einar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Whaling in the Faroe Islands is conducted in accordance with international law and globally recognized principles of sustainable development,” according to the island’s government website. “It is sustainable and fully regulated, with a strong emphasis on animal welfare, and a requirement today for participants to be licensed to use the mandatory methods and equipment. Whale drives only take place in bays that are officially approved for the purpose, and only schools of whales found in close proximity to land, usually within one nautical mile, are driven ashore.”

    The fact that it has to be justified in this way shows that something isn’t right. Just because something is legal doesn’t make it right.

    Also, what kind of nonsense is this: “with a strong emphasis on animal welfare”. It’s a species hunted and killed by the hundreds! What kind of welfare is seen there!?

    Humans’ way of justifying their dubious morals can be disgusting!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just for the sake of accuracy, not because I don’t think this is barbaric, it’s definitely barbaric, but they hunt pilot whales, which aren’t endangered.

      • Einar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I stand corrected. I misread the last paragraph.

        I edited my comment accordingly.

        Source.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah, it’s ok then. Second most intelligent conscious creatures are hunted by the third.

          • MxM111@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You said it is barbaric, but you have not said it is not OK. Some barbaric actions are OK.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you really being that anal? Of course it’s not okay.

              And I can’t think of a barbaric action that is okay. Can you give me an example?

                  • MxM111@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I need to apologize. I was simply trolling you. I thought it would be fun for you too, but I think I was mistaken.

    • dudebro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m curious if they’re eating these animals.

      If they’re doing it to survive, then I honestly have no problem with hunting and encourage them to do it in a sustainable manner.

      • Einar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They eat them. But there is no need to do so. It’s a tradition.

        Source: Britannica.

        This source also highlights the hypocrisy of saying that there’s a focus on animal welfare.

        • Kacarott@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no need to eat any animal and yet as a society we seem to have no problem with mass meat industry. Now, I don’t disagree that there is hypocrisy in saying there is a focus on welfare, but I also feel some hypocrisy in there being outrage on some particular animals being eaten while other animals being eaten is fine.