• Anekdoteles@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      Isn’t it everywhere? I think this is another strong indicator of how we need new cities that are fostered a little less to generating profit and instead to generating quality value for the people living there. If so, tourism would change automatically.

      • BerührtGras@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh absolutely and probably also not a hot take. Ban AirBnb and vacation flats in cities. The Prague city centre during covid was a ghost town, because of all the AirBnbs in the city. Regular citizens get priced out and the vacancy rate is high.

        • Anekdoteles@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m not even sure if AirBnb per se is a problem. Depends on the time frame, we’re talking about. If they are used for below two weeks they are just better hotels, but as a multiple months accommodation for nomads interested in being part of the city and making meaningful connections - why not?

          • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Here’s why not: Because too much vacancies/transient inhabitants destroys communities.

            A lot of shops etc depend on local customers. If there is too small a consumer base, these shops disappear starting a cycle that is detrimental to the neighborhood.

            This separated from the assholes that drag their airport suitcases with hard plastic wheels across the pavement at all hours. Have weekday keg parties and all sorts of other shenanigans. Neighborhoods are for living, hotels and other accomodations are permitted for a reason.

            The way it all started was people with a spare bedroom, which is fine. Then the residents will make sure that people behave and that the airBnB’ers behave.

            • Anekdoteles@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Here’s why not: Because too much vacancies/transient inhabitants destroys communities.

              But that’s precisely what I meant? If they are rented out for at least a couple of months, so that you can grow into a community. Why not?

              • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Ah like that, I did not read your point like that.

                But then it’s rental is it not? Renters have a lot of laws governing them, and slumlord should not get to bypass those by using airBnB.

          • filister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Oh please, rents were increasing higher than wages for decades now, taking even bigger chunk of the pay of regular people. And Airbnb and Booking in tourist/business hotspots are to blame to a large extent for that.

            • Anekdoteles@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              That’s at least an easy explanation, but it totally fails at answering the question as to why it became so much more beneficial to just own money instead of selling work for it in the recent decades. AirBnB has nothing to do with that.