• BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          The article, to which you have linked, concerns a 60 year old critique of the contemporary US educational system. Besides the critique being of dubious relevance, simply due to its age, using it to argue that compulsory education is akin to imprisonment for many is misleading, if not fraudulent. Quite frankly it seems to me, that you linked the first apperarently appropriate hit in your google search.

            • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              According to whom?

              Have you actually read it? If you had, you could have addressed my arguments, instead of feigning indignation that I hadn’t spent the 10 minutes reading a seemingly superannuated critique of an equally archaic educational system.

              Do you make a habit of reading every eight-page Wikipedia article someone randomly links to in an online debate, without said person qualifying the article?

              • index@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                if you are interested in the argument i encourage you to read the book and check the other references in the wiki page

    • letmesleep@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      No, it is forced labor and indeed a serious infraction on human rights, but it’s by no means slavery. Slaves can be sold and subjected to a bunch of other abuses.

      Unlike slavery forced labor can be acceptable in certain conditions. I don’t think conscription in Western countries falls under that. It’s far too expensive (delaying people’s entry to the workforce by a year should cost more than 2% of GDP and you can buy a lot of advanced weaponry with that much money) and in most places getting enough people into the military should be doable by offering more benefits. But in countries like Ukraine or in the West when we’re talking about things like natuaral disasters it may be necessary to force people to work for the community.

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        work for the community.

        Shooting at people and dropping bombs it’s not work. The community is not the government.

        • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Shooting at people and dropping bombs it’s not work.

          Is that all you think military service teaches you?

          The community is not the government.

          I guess we could discuss the validity of each country’s implementation of democracy , but, at least in theory, the power to govern derives from a mandate from the community. So no, the community is by extension the government.

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Is that all you think military service teaches you?

            No i’m sure they teach you how to play the guitar and draw paintings, not using guns designed and built to kill people.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ok. It’s worth adding that in Denmark you can be a conscientious objector and go work in a public library instead.

      I mean, there’s slavery and then there’s “working in a public library”. I’m not 100% sure they are the same.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        1: Libraries have absolutely been supported with slave labor in the past.

        2: Forced labor is forced labor.

        3: There is still a difference between a draft to defend your country from a fascist like Putin and being drafted to invade Vietnam. I wouldn’t personally call the first slavery, but the second one is.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If being told you have certain obligations you must adhere to is “slavery” then, sure, it’s slavery.

          You’re also expected to do your homework, tidy up your room, keep under the speed limit, not throw litter.

          The world is full of demands on us. Some times the mature thing is just to say “sure, I’ll do my bit”.

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m not sure you understand what mandatory military service is. You are not expected to do it, if you don’t you get punished and go to jail.

            Are you suggesting we jail kids that don’t do their homeworks?

            Do you understand that Russia has conscription and it’s forcing people to go to the front? The same thing is happening in Israel

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I spent 3 years in an army that relied on conscription. I do get it, I think.

              I’m fine with a conscientious objector option; this was an option when I joined up and some took it.

              I think there’s a huge gulf between being “forced” to join the army (navy/airforce) of a democratic state’s which serves a purpose a of defending the country against attacks vs being forced to join a force which attacks another country or people. I didn’t make the distinction clear so I’m glad you’re calling me out on it. For clarity, then: I’m talking about conscription into a territorial defense force, not an expeditionary aggressor force.

              • index@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Russia is defending themself from the nazi, israel is defending themself from hamas, france is talking about sending troops to ukraine to defend europe. It’s always the same story. An actual defense conscription would teach people how to throw boiling oil out of their windows, doesn’t seem like it’s going to happen or the goal.