The second interview of a CBC piece answered some similar questions I had. This ruling provides precedence and can stop a future invocation of the Emergencies Act in its tracks through an injunction from the Federal Court of Appeal, if it’s granted.
The government is appealing the decision because they believe the invocation was reasonable and justified. The Liberals are currently behind in the polls, so politically it’s within the government’s interest to appeal this. The act itself is decades old and never invoked prior to this so both the civil liberty groups and the government are probably keen on getting clarification on the legal usage of the act from the Supreme Court of Canada.
Personally, I fully support the usage of the act. What I found unreasonable was the lack of accountability with the provincial police.
The shirt supplier may also be a factor. An American/EU size M is like an Asian L or XL. So if they changed the supplier then that’s a possibility for the change.
deleted by creator
Elf on the shelf, meet owl on the bough.
Capitalism doesn’t believe in Robin Hood. Robbin’ hoods on the other hand…
That’s right, it goes in the… wait a minute, that’s not the square hole.
Country is fine. City too.
I opened the community in the browser, since I use Connect, just in case but I forgot your Lemmy account also has its own block list. And indeed I had it blocked. Hence why I didn’t recall it.
I was like huh, that’s one I haven’t seen before. Visit the community and it’s empty.
Looks like community promo needs a community promo on community promo cause community promo has no communities promoed.
“Worn thin” is past tense for a reason.
I would take you at your word but since I read it on the internet…
On a more serious note, I didn’t expect so many serious replies given the community. But I did decide to look it up and yeah, apparently it may turn your pudding black. And yes, I knew it’s not a real product. For now.
I think it’s appropriate for me to say this given the place: prove it. Surely there would be no repercussions were you to provide the evidence. As the saying goes, the proof is in the pudding.
Completely unrealistic. Why I ask, would your poop not be pink?
I like how because it’s units of Canadas, it’s an even 10 parts.
And how do you know the mysterious illness is simply not giving staves sentience?
Username checks ou… username does not check out. On a more serious note, Connect for Lemmy has the option to block instances at an account level.
I like to browse All as well and haven’t noticed that bot. If the issue is just with a single account, I think defederation seems unnecessary. Could you provide more information on the benefit for defederation versus banning the bot on Lemmy.ca? And I’m one of those people who prefer pledging defederation of Threads, so I support such a move depending on the situation.
EDIT: Correction, I checked my block list and that user account is in there. 😂
It’s an app-specific feature so using another app or viewing through your browser would not have the feature. Hopefully it’s baked into Lemmy/Kbin itself in the near future so users can manage it across access points, like blocking of users or communities.
That was one of many factors that I think the invocation was necessary. Th residents, as well as affected businesses, in Ottawa were left to fend for themselves as leadership(including the police) could not end the occupation of the downtown core. There were multiple blockades of varying degrees that were also problematic. What came out of the Coutts blockade was worrisome to say the least. The one at the Ambassador Bridge was cleared but who knew if people would come back or setup elsewhere. No one knew how things would play out at the time but there was a lot of concern across Canada. Even by the judge’s admission, he may have advised the same conclusion the government decided on.
At the end of the day I agree with the public inquiry that didn’t find it unreasonable and perhaps revisions to the Emergencies Act is something to consider.