Raltoid

The only people using Facebook these days either don’t know what addons/extentions are, or they are forced to use it through work/business.

deleted by creator

Yeah the whole “I love unions, but we at this company are a family so we don’t need that”, is peak anti-union talk. Throughout history it’s been used by people who are horrible to their employees.

You don’t hire your partner as the head of HR unless you want to hide a bad work enviroment.

While the conditions are terrible and it’s obviously a made up charge, her governement is pretty much China.

She was born in China and lived in Australia from she was 10 until she was 20-21 and then she moved to China, where she has lived for the last 27 years. So ~37 of her 47 years was spent in China, and over a decade of that was spent working for a governement owned propaganda outlet.

She is technically an Australian citizen, which she became in 2003, after she had already moved to China.

They don’t face any consequences, so why would they stop increasing it? They don’t care about people, they just care aboout themselves and their money. So as long as nothing happens, they’ll keep going.

I’m guessing they’re the ones who keep pushing the “europe abusing africa” memes recently as well, since they’re the ones doing it now.

Let’s not skip over the fact that he probably got the dynamite from an abandonded house, so it’s most likely pretty old.

And there were detonators there as well.

I’ve read these stories multiple times now and I still don’t quite understand what’s happening.

That’s because it’s mostly lies and propaganda not aimed at you, but the Russian people.

Russians have been burning those offices for over a year, with it ramping up after people started getting forcefully recruited. Russia as always is trying to say it’s not “real russians” doing it, but people influenced by “the evil west”. It’s their standard strategy when it comes to pretty much any set back, ever. In this case it’s mostly blamed on “evil ukranian scammers”, so they can keep justifying the invasion and occupation.

The ceo is a bigoted asshole, Brave is chromium, it was initially funded by Peter Thiel and they’re literally just trying to make their own adsense network.

The self-proclaimed privacy focused browser is tracking your browsing and want to serve you personalized ads, and I think they want to use that tracking data for AI training as well, meaning other people can potentially access it.

And lets not forget about their crypto currency that you can earn by turning on special ads. Which they seemingly unironically called it “Basic Attent Tokens”…

TL;DR: The company is basically a sham company trying to usher in a dystopia. Where you’ll get paid for staring at ads, while having all your data stolen and sold back to you.

It’s a joke post. Which makes it extra funny, and quite sad, how many of the comment seem to think it’s serious and are unironically chiming in with complaints.

OPs username is “Peter Poopshit”, I wouldn’t take anything they post seriously.

Why the fuck anyone is humouring these clowns is beyond me.

Answer: Money.

They hand out money like candy at Halloween.

Having just looked that up, I doubt he has any idea what NFTs are.

Having seen recipes for mtn dew marinated chicken and kool-aid pickles, yeah I’d have to check too.

To be fair, it was low pressure because it operated by creating a partial vacuum from condensing steam.

It’s a link aggregator that finds an available file to stream to you from servers that already have the full file, which may or may not have been assembled from a legitimate source or torrent.

That’s literally the argument they use for torrents as well. They don’t host any material, just point to it. And they are still being taken down left and right for breaking some law or another in regards to that.

While true that they’re not polluting for fun, many corporations will try to avoid any anti-pollution measure that will lose them money. To the point where they spend billions of dollars every year to lobby governements, enviromental protection organizations, and drag out regulations with lawsuits. Because in the long run it’s usually worth it for them to pollute, as long as the investors see enough profits in the short term.

I think they’re trying to implement a sort of “smart prediction” thing, where it assumes that if you go back the link you clicked wasn’t relevant. And so it tries to remove closely related results. Which works the opposite if you get two results from the same page and you click the wrong one. Which makes looking up technical or programming related issues a nightmare.

With the TL;DR being: Google/Alphabet wants to more easily block non-chrome browsers ability to use their services, and prevent the use of adblocking.

Which also means that many people using accessability tools will be unable to access them. And they are trying to get Firefox to implement it as well, so they don’t take all the blame when shit hits the fan and they start getting multi-billion dollar monopoly fines from the EU.

deleted by creator