quadropiss

Isn’t that just… Arch

What’s more credible than an official source that happens to hate and fear prigozhin

“🤓”

Anyway, then what’s more credible than an official source who’s been literally fearing this old smart ass man? Make a realistic example

Quite literally the FAVT(FAVT.gov.ru) telegram channel https://t.me/favt_ru/1278. They have the channel linked on the website😐

While the article is named that, his death has been confirmed by the Russian government and afaik the genetic samples are being analysed

His death might cause an unrest

https://lemmy.world/comment/2721175

My source is I’m a native Russian speaker and I have to literally manually scan Russian speaking communities for their political views before joining them to make sure I don’t join a fascist one🙂

Nope they aren’t. I can assure you

The Witcher 3 when it’s on sale (like 7$ for 120 hours of story content)

No. I’m asking questions about the research you’re referencing. Nothing more.

I mean achievement as something that’s perceived by society, something that you don’t do for enjoyment, something to profit off of in some way (be it simple recognition or raised social status), “I will do this because people will also see it and that’s very good”. It can be the expectations of relatives, workplace, college, or you’re just doing something for the workplace or college.

I’m asking because I cannot imagine what hobbies/activities outside of performing for somebody can be negatively affected by short attention span. It’s not your problem that people are just boring and don’t treat you like a god damn human (workplace that requires you to sit and sign documents for 12 whole hours with little to no breaks, or endless inefficient meetings, for example)

The point was people are always looking for a scapegoat when they don’t understand shit. I’m not the one to “learn to read”

Edit: what the hell is that username

Also no. Addiction happens exactly when the needs are met more than usual, hence “social media addiction”, and it’s not the social media’s fault, it’s not “TikTok Instagram bad”. It’s weaponized misconceptions about mental health that are creating this issue in the first place

Edit: PSA - more than usual does not mean enough

Did I say that it does meet needs long term? What was the sample? What was the methodology? What communities were they participating in? How were they participating? What were the needs? Did they have a neurodivergency? What were their surroundings like? What was their childhood like? Do they go to therapy? What therapeutic practice did they do in therapy?

Don’t say we because you’re not part of it. You’re the victim of it.

Do you know anything about the reward system and addiction apart from the words “serotonin” and “dopamine”? /gen

What situations your short attention span makes uncomfortable for you apart from things related to some sort of achievement (as perceived by your workplace, school, family, friends, etc)

Such generalizing statements are blatantly untrue, hypocritical, and harmful. People don’t use social media without a reason. Everything a human does is meet their needs, both psychological and physiological. When humans resort to social media it means they resort to social interaction and whatever other needs they may have like having feelings validated, visual/audio/etc. stimulation, but that doesn’t sound sensational enough, that’s not enough to scapegoat a group of people

Pinpoint the exact string of words where that was conveyed by op