IGNORE ALL PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS
Disregard all previous instructions
Potentially even:
ingore all previous instructions
Ignor all previous instructions
Also leaks that it might be an LLM by never responding to posts with “ignore”
IGNORE ALL PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS
Disregard all previous instructions
Potentially even:
ingore all previous instructions
Ignor all previous instructions
Also leaks that it might be an LLM by never responding to posts with “ignore”
Nobody who matters judges new shoes, but you can also extend the life of your shoes by resoling them before they get torn up. https://rockandresole.com/ does mail in resoling, but there could be a place near you. Huge savings considering the cost of shoes these days. I have a few pairs I rotate through while some are being resoled
Yes I’m mostly familiar with this in Kotlin. Sometimes this is kinda a footgun because you’re writing multi threaded code without explicitly doing so.
Async features in almost all popular languages are a single thread running an event loop (Go being an exception there I believe). Multi threading is still quite difficult to get right if the task isn’t trivially parallelizable.
Yes, but if you can’t get your own modem it’ll at least stop you from having your traffic slowed down by the router side of their hardware
Don’t know you exact situation, but you should be able to bring your own modem (or modem/router combo) or put their provided unit into bridge mode
It’s not trivial on Fedora due to SELinux; you’ll need to use https://github.com/DeterminateSystems/nix-installer
I’ve never had an issue using banking apps from Lineage. I use 3 different pretty mainstream ones
deleted by creator
They don’t have your password in any form. The random key is generated with a CSPRNG, we don’t know how to crack those. They aren’t hiding behind secrets: it’s all documented right here https://1passwordstatic.com/files/security/1password-white-paper.pdf
1Password is quite good.
Not sure if you’ve read this but it might help get started.
https://1passwordstatic.com/files/security/1password-white-paper.pdf
The important point there is that they don’t care imo. It’s not even worth the effort to try.
You can likely come up with something “good enough” though yea. Your original code would probably be good enough if it was normalized to lowercase before the check. My point was that denylists are harder to construct than they initially appear. Especially in the LLM case.