The simulation designer would not be creative enough
now you’re making assumptions about how the creators of our simulation think, when we also know nothing about them
why would you assume they think in the same way we do? why would you assume what they do would even be considered “thinking” by us at all?
fall somewhere on the spectrum of having a complete inversion of the rules of their universe or having an exact copy of the rules of their universe
- you think the creator of the simulation is capable of specifying each rule of our universe, but not just inverting all of them?
- “somewhere on the spectrum” includes positions closer to a complete inversion than not, so even if you take this as given - which you probably shouldn’t - you still can’t make claims with any certainty
there are natural limits to what would be conceivable
firstly, i don’t think that holds true under the laws of our universe
secondly, why would it hold true under the laws of theirs?
you’re now sitting here justifying paying artists in exposure?
disney doesn’t avoid breaching copyright in our world because of the threat of being found out. they avoid breaching copyright because they’d be sued.