70% of revenue goes to rights holders.
Thus could mean that 69% of revenues go to rights holders A and B and 1% of revenues are spread between holders C - Z.
70% of revenue goes to rights holders.
Thus could mean that 69% of revenues go to rights holders A and B and 1% of revenues are spread between holders C - Z.
Are you sure “fixed” is the correct word?
What? Rumors work by people discussing them.
I didn’t ask for proof.
Can I find out more about these rumors somewhere?
More like a for profit arm ruled by an non profit head.
The mirrors are the not the expensive part.
it would be a bit like the adult version of Home Alone
Ah. So Skyfall then
None of the suggestions above talk about comedy fantasy. Is there anyone close to the master? GNU
They probably have to show revenue
You are given a calf-skin wallet on your birthday…
I’ve stayed in one in Osaka. You don’t have access to clothes or belongings during your stay. It’s a lot like staying on a space ship without the travel.
News reposts can add value.
In your example what happens if the shirt is sold to someone else? In the NFT case the signature changes.
The shirt analogy doesn’t work well, but NFTs are great for transferable tickets.
However NFTs were trying to assign value to the receipt for the Gretzky shirt.
… Aww. Why did the story stop?
Get off my lawn
Yes. It’s possible, but they are not of interest to nuclear power states.
There are nuclear plants in operation today that do not use or create any fuel that is capable of being weaponized.
And they cost too much. Governments only fund weaponizeable fission.
In fact, coal plants admit much more radiation than a modern nuclear power plant.
Not in a way that can be concentrated and weaponized.
We’re all out of cake.