alaphic

Man… This right here is a huge part of why I decided to try going back to consoles after being a PC only gamer for like 20+ years

Awww did i hurt the poor wittle racist’s feelings? How sad 🤣😂

It was more denigrating, than anything, if you wanna go down that road, precious. 😋 And you seemed more than pleased to open the door to insults, so… I dunno, don’t dish it out if you can’t take it, snowflake?

And if it was just an understanding issue, I would’ve simply said you were ignorant, but at this point either you’re genuinely incapable of understanding or being purposefully obtuse. Both are pretty fucking stupid, so…

I mean, I guess? I dunno, I kinda wondered that at first, but I’m also kinda at a loss at to what other comment that could be a response to as well…? 🤷‍♂️ I mean, it seems like it’s at least in the right thread, mostly, from the context lol 😂

Science is pretty much by definition supposed to be an objective measurement of the universe, uncolored and unaffected by political or idealogical bias (those would be your “political censorship” and “funding cuts” you mentioned, since you’re apparently having trouble following along…) Since science should be objective, funding based on idealogical grounds or the political censorship of research is anathema to science, as it is by definition not objective. I’m not sure how I can make that any clearer.

I’m not sure what about any of this has to do with me making friends, but let me know how attempting to be condescending and thinking you’re clever while completely missing a simple point works out for you… Cuz I may be autistic, but you’re stupid, and I know which I’d rather be 🤣😂

Both what? Tf are you talking about??

Who are you responding to here? 🤔

So, I guess just in case you’re somehow genuinely unfamiliar with a nested comment structure (which, if so, you’ve got to explain your situation to me, because I honestly can’t think of a probable scenario in which you aren’t, yet it’s 2025 and you also have both a device with internet access and the faculties to reply to me): That was what’s known as a ‘top-level comment’, which means it wasn’t a reply to anything, but instead a comment which can be responded to that gets listed alongside other comments which can also be responded to… Any responses to these - such as your question - get listed beneath (otherwise known as being ‘nested’ under) the original comment or post, where it can be replied to in turn. Collectively, this is known as a ‘comment thread’.

Got it now? 👍

On both sides of what? What are you even talking about? And what other media, exactly, is providing not only a public mouthpiece to, but also driving steady streams of traffic directly toward, unabashed misogynists and bigots? I’ll wait… 🙄

You can definitely take your dogwhistles and white supremacist apologism and fuck right off with it tho 😁

If I had to give a single reason, it’d probably be because they’re the ones, by and large, who are not only providing a platform for the dissemination of these abhorrent views by this trash, but they’re directly profiting from it to boot… I feel like that’s honestly pretty obvious, though I’m gonna give you the benefit of the doubt here and choose to assume you’re genuinely asking and not just being facetious

I think a better question would be: Why don’t they want to?

Yeah, uhmm… I’m pretty sure - checks notes - yeah, that’s actually the exact opposite of how science works… Thanks for playin, tho!

This is the comment I came here for

This was honestly what I was more inclined to believe, though I also know that I don’t have enough information about the subject to have a truly informed opinion… It was my understanding, however, that despite all their grandiose claims aren’t LLMs (at least, our current models anyway) essentially ‘ranked choice’ dialogue trees, sort of, where the next word is determined by statistical likelihood of X word being next based on the input and what material it has been trained on? Or am I wrong?

Obviously I’m not OP, but I took them to mean content that might be considered superfluous or otherwise not as meaningful to the overarching narrative in and of itself

Buch dich!

Yes.

I feel like you’re the one who knows your husband best here, so - with al due respect - fuck their opinion, tbh

Ping me yourself, you coward!

Wow, just in time for Elon v. Musk: The Bitch-Off

So, I never really watched anything on YouTube until recently when I stumbled into some true crime rabbit holes and ended up finding my way there. Anyway, I kept noticing frequent audio cutouts and upon paying closer attention I realized the creators were intentionally censoring certain words (like sexual assault, suicide, rape, etc) as they found if they didn’t their videos would end up randomly removed - sometimes after weeks or even months had passed without incident- delisted (essentially) from recommendation algorithms, or simply inexplicably demonitized. This also seems to happen if certain figures are mentioned, such as (though certainly not limited to) the likes of Marilyn Monroe, suspected/known members of a variety of child trafficking and CSAM rings that operated in Europe throughout the 70s, 80s, 90s, and on, and - as you may’ve surmised by this point - Jeffery Epstein.

Do with that what you will.