![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
Voyager is extremely impressive for what it is - webapp
It’s not only a webapp anymore, but also available as native app now
Voyager is extremely impressive for what it is - webapp
It’s not only a webapp anymore, but also available as native app now
No, this is the most serious lacking feature IMO.
But you could of course simply register your username at multiple instances and subscribe to the same communities. As there’s no ‘followers’ like on Mastodon, the effect is the same.
If that’s so, these instances (and who knows which other ones in the world) now host OPs and comments that I as an author decided to delete.
How does one delete information from the fediverse? If this is true, you cannot. Your data will be hosted forever, at least somewhere.
If people use their personal name for an account, this might result in a significant GDPR problem for all instances.
What will Apple do if they if the EU continues their plans with regard to client side scanning? That’s not one country, but many.
Apple previously planned on introducing client side scanning, but backed out after they received a high amount of critique.
Yeah, I agree this unwanted behavior of Lemmy. It’s a variation on ‘security by obscurity’. It’s ‘social security’ by obscurity. Except that it isn’t obscure at all.
I didn’t know Kbin users could see the upvotes, but I’ve just discovered that kbin users only see favorites. Just like on Mastodon.
Check out the Kbin page @banaflip@kbin.social shared in another comment. You can see who upvoted your comment under ‘activity’. If you upvote my comment, my comment favorite count increases with one. And you can see you are one of the ‘upvoters’ under favorites.
If however you downvote my comment, one of the favorites appears to get removed. By you. Even if you didn’t upvote before. At least, that’s what I think happened when I tried this on another comment.
Well, that’s about it. But isn’t this strange?
At least, that’s what appears to be happening. You can check for yourself with the link provided to the Kbin instance above.
Interesting. But that’s more like the Mastodon favorite I guess. And considering the heavy Mastodon/Kbin similarities, that’s not surprising of course.
There’s also a downvote and upvote section, but those are all empty.
I’ll deliberately try to downvote your comment to see what happens.
Edit: indeed, there’s no downvote. Just one less upvote. How does this work?
Edit2: I’ve undone my downvote and now two favorites show again. But what’s weird is that my downvote simply removed the upvote of the (first?) upvoter of your comment. Is this really what Kbin does? You cannot start removing upvotes of random other users can you?
Isn’t that weird?
Kbin users can see it, admins can see it, but Lemmy users cannot.
Apparently, Kbin users can also see what Lemmy users upvote them. Is that correct?
No, what I mean is that any user can randomly start sending DMs to another user and I don’t want any DMs.
Blocking is an action when the DM was already received.
if not most mobile apps don’t even support DMs at all, so you can use those.
Thanks for the suggestion, but that’s not a suitable work around for me.
I use Voyager and consider it by far the best client, but I’m not going to switch apps because Lemmy doesn’t allow DMs to be blocked.
It’s also not just about hiding, but the sender should be aware the DM cannot be send.
You cannot block a user that already send you a message.
You also cannot delete a DM unless the administrator helps you. If you receive abusive material you’re more or less stuck with it.
I don’t want DMs, but I must accept them now.
You don’t need to allow other people on your server.
If you start your own server, you moderate yourself.
Whether others want to federate with your server is up to them.
The best way to get a quick understanding I think is to listen to episode 561 (2015) of This American Life about NUMMI in California:
https://www.thisamericanlife.org/561/nummi-2015
Toyota was more or less forced to start building cars in the US in the early eighties and did so in an unlikely joint venture with General Motors. GM was very interested in learning how Toyota build their cars. Bottom line: the Toyota Production System or TPS is mostly a way of management thinking that is completely different from the way most companies in the world manage people.
It is based on trusting employees, enforcing employees by training them, allowing employees to report errors as soon as possible, viewing the production proces as a manager with your own senses, understanding the production proces, truly following a vision and more.
Toyota actually does what most managers learn in management schools but don’t practice. Most managers outside Toyota want to be a boss and not a leader. But Toyota wants leaders that are being followed by employees based on intrinsic values.
Interestingly, the Toyota Production System is heavily influenced by the Training Within Industry program developed by the US Army during WWII and taught in post-war Japan by the US. And statistician W. Edwards Demming who showed Japan what true PDCA looks like.
Although an initial success, the production plant ultimately stopped operating. It was purchased by Tesla, and AFAIK, as of today Teslas are being build in the same plant in Fremont. But I highly doubt TPS is used to build Teslas.
Really? Didn’t know that was possible but it’s great to hear that.
This is a good question, because it never gets a proper answer.
I think most people consider it a way to approve or disapprove an OP or comment, but it’s completely unclear why.
Let’s say you post an OP about basketballs in the community!basketballsarecool@someinstance. If your OP describes all the cool things about basketballs, you’ll receive upvotes. If your OP describes basketballs are useless, you’ll receive downvotes. And it probably will be the reverse in the community!basketballsareuseless@someinstance.
Lemmy could at least stand out if the development community would remove downvotes. It’s an unnecessary polarizing passive aggressive way to disagree with somebody, that leads to all kinds if unnecessary negative emotions.
But it would be even better if the whole upvote / downvote system can be disabled. You don’t know who is upvoting / downvoting and what does it say?
Voyager is now available as a native app in the app/play store