I think it started out that way but eventually they took the dinosaur to a museum because they couldn’t do it on their own. It was a children’s book I probably read 30 years ago.
Creator of SlippiHUD Rejector of Enshittification Locksmith Melee Puff P+ Sonic HDR Greninja @SmashToday@discuss.smash.today
I think it started out that way but eventually they took the dinosaur to a museum because they couldn’t do it on their own. It was a children’s book I probably read 30 years ago.
I remember this book, I don’t remember microdosing, but I’m pretty sure the dinosaur hatched from a chicken egg.
Becoming incoherent because of a illness, that doesn’t hospitalize you, isn’t a great trait for a president.
We lost to Trump in 2016 because we ignored how relentlessly unpopular Hilary Clinton was, Republicans spent decades smearing her every chance they got.
Biden just proved their claims about his mental fitness, if we ignore that by calling it optics, we’ll lose.
Sure, but zero costs changed for me, insurance premium was the same, taxes were the same, interest rate was the same (fixed interest loan). And yet somehow they low balled it and now it’s my job to fix it.
I’ve got Knob and Tube wiring in part of my home, so only the state of Ohio is willing to insure me, and my insurance premiums stayed the same. So at least I have that going for me. My bank still raised my mortgage by 20% because apparently they can’t set up an escrow properly and apparently that’s my problem now.
I see where you’re at, but everything I mentioned is in the first paragraph of the article. It’s not like it’s buried.
There’s far more nuance than the headline suggests. He said he’d stop commencement specifically if the cops came to arrest people. He also asked no one shout down the president.
He did not request zero protest.
It seems pretty bad all around. Even the privileged are looking at over a third of their jobs vanishing due to automation.
If we’re going to force people to work to live, maybe removing jobs due to automation isn’t the best thing for society.
If you read the whole article it also explains that it’s European version of the same product doesn’t contain added sugar.
The auto summary missed some key points in the article.
Article about DuckAssist. It is powered by an OpenAI product. It doesn’t do enough to bother me, and I can easily ignore it.
Why on earth would running a service that actually costs money be a good idea for company so deep in a hole on a webservice that’s comparatively free to run.
The brave browser has AI already, it’s a matter of time until their search engine does too.
Frankly I trust duckduckgo more than brave with that data.
I also do not have any better suggestions.
Yes, truth social is completely impossible without trump. Nobody could possibly spin up a mastodon instance without a former president backing you. Just absolutely unheard of.
This seems like a conspiracy for targeted harassment, with a strong case of doxxing.
With an email account I created 10 minutes ago and no registered church within the app, I’ve been able to pull the names and addresses of myself, my neighbors, and the names of people whose address I’ve checked.
This is a privacy nightmare.
I agree with this political stunt to point out the Trump Courts illegitimacy.
The words of the constitution currently have no value to the Trump Court. They just invented Total Criminal Immunity for official acts, and anything said to a government employee isn’t admissible in court. In a country founded on the idea no one is above the law.
This court is worse than the Dredd Scott court, they’ll just rule up is down and any amendment meant to undermine their decision actually affirms it.
For those arguing that Biden couldn’t do the funniest thing ever, I disagree. It truely doesn’t matter if they rule it an unofficial act. The purpose of this ruling is to get Trump out of his 34 felonies he’s already been convicted of because they used a lot of testimony from administration employees. So as long as that part of the ruling stands, Biden can still get away with anything. How do you convict with no witnesses.