![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
They don’t just want to, they’re succeeding.
They don’t just want to, they’re succeeding.
In the tech world drug users, particularly of hallucinogens, probably make up the top 10%.
On the one hand, better you know what they collect about you than not. And as long as you use a streaming service they’re collecting data on you.
On the other hand, streaming services are inherently wasteful and lead to pointless and excessive power usage which contributes to climate change, not to mention the privacy concerns, all of which could have been avoided by reasonably priced buy-once-own-forever media.
All this working is not working
You are tearing me apart, Lisa!
That you don’t see the problem
Then he’s a popular lord
And the lord is back in his fiefdom
One fash
Two fash
Red fash
Blue fash
Glory to Owlbear 🥸
Let’s assume you’re right. Why would anyone vote for anyone committing genocide? Voting third party or abstaining would be your only moral option in this scenario, otherwise you’re complicit. At this point the number of dead Palestinian children is conservatively 4000. If you contribute to reelecting a leader enabling that, their blood is on your hands.
Because if there’s nothing else you can count on an American president for, it’s them being a standard-bearer for ethics.
“asked”
Yep, found your problem right there. It’s your argument, full of holes, it is.
You don’t ask a genocidal power that you’re supplying to stop commiting genocide. You tell them they’ll stop or best case scenario (for them) they’re on their own. Worst case scenario (for them), you stop them yourself.
Princess Chelsea invites you for an audience
Found the Aussie 🦘
but at least they aren’t constantly being approved of by the KKK and being touted by mass shooters.
Just the IDF and Likud, which shares nothing in ideology or methodology with them.
“becoming”
“But that’s the point”, Tech Leaders responded.