Mordikan

Damn kids with your twitternets and me mes.

What does Lemmy (an open community) have to do with privacy? What does privacy have to do with piracy?

1. If X was not available to pirate, would you pay for it?
2. If you would not have paid for X, does pirating X cause any actual loss to its owner? If you would not have paid for it either way (even if that were the only option) and you haven’t caused them a loss of revenue by pirating it, did you impact the creator at all?

The counter to this is always that just because someone wouldn’t pay doesn’t mean the creator’s work has no value. To that I would yes that is completely true. The creator’s work has value, but maybe not monetary value. You can’t always conflate value to money (ex. FOSS, canonical sci-fi lore, protest symbols, etc).

There is also a morality component used against my argument that would say I’m ignoring the intent, consent, and ownership the creator has. Its usually worded that I’m using outcome-based morality and that the ends always justifies the means by that logic. But I pay for X, not for access to use X. If the creator can opt without my consent to remove X from me, I’m not longer obligated to follow that moral constraint. Morality is a two-way street.

Germany hasn’t officially endorsed ChatControl, and groups like Hetzner outright oppose it. In the US, ChatControl takes the form of the LAED Act and the EARN IT Act. All three focus on this appeal to emotion that to protect kids we need to get rid of end-to-end encryption. Legislators are pretty fucking dumb when it comes to this stuff, though. They don’t understand that if they have a backdoor to encryption, everyone has a backdoor to encryption.

that would require sitting down and manually doing that for every conceivable payee

That’s just called VLOOKUP(). I think you’re over-complicating this process. If you sit down and look at your finances, you’ll notice that the number of payees you have isn’t some absurd unmanageable amount. As others have mentioned, there’s no real use case for involving AI this way. There’s no scale, no real benefit to financial tracking, etc. I get this is just to use AI for the sake of using AI, but that’s not really a goal when writing financial software.

Honestly, you don’t even need NLP for this. Excel supports regex now so you could just do a call like =REGEXTEST(A1, "(?!)^w.*mart$"). Then just mark by type and graph out to see where your main spending is coming from.

Germany’s legislation is largely spearheading the effort. They aren’t trying to build the infrastructure to support it, they already have the infrastructure. They are one of if not the biggest GDPR actors and have a large datacenter presence through companies like Hetzner and DE-CIX.

SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN means incorrect SAN information, proxying, or DNS manipulation is occurring. You could compare what you see in the browser and what you see via something like: $ openssl s_client -showcerts -connect cs.rin.ru:443

You could also check the DNS resolution and traceroute to see how you are getting there to confirm if DNS is being effected or you are being proxied: $ dig cs.rin.ru @127.0.0.1 A $ mtr cs.rin.ru

I’m sorry, its been a long day.

DNS4EU doesn’t provide DDNS service, you are correct. Checkout deSEC, they partner with DNS4EU and the EU as part of the initiative to limit dependency on US based infrastructure.

You might try DNS4EU: 86.54.11.1 86.54.11.201 DoH: https://protective.joindns4.eu/dns-query DoT: protective.joindns4.eu

I had a similar setup to this awhile back. You have to port the number to your VoIP provider of choice and then decide on what client you are going to run (no need for SIM card). I was wanting voice service and only needed limited SMS, so I went with linphone (and played around with zoiper too). If you are needing good SMS support, then JMP is probably the best. It supports both SMS and MMS. You won’t get E911 access I believe, but as data only its a good solution.

Free wifi is all over the place and if you wire up a mobile hotspot in your car (yes it somewhat defeats the purpose), you can get some pretty decent coverage.

I think the idea of an IP address (IPv6 or not) providing anyone a semblance of privacy is wishful thinking in this age. Google ad revenue in the EU is estimated to be lower because the power in GPDR areas isn’t in PII obfuscation, its in the consent model. Positive opt-in to Legitimate Vendor Interest makes tracking difficult, not whether your IP is generic. You have to remember companies like Google are still able to monetize off of users in mobile CG-NAT environments in the US/EU. Given the roughly 150 other metrics Google (or any publisher/SSP would have access to), removing one doesn’t really stem the tide.

What’s also interesting is how IPs become anonymized. For IPv4, the industry standard I kid you not is to take the 4th octet and mark it zero. That’s it. It just assumes carriers use /24 CIDRs like someone’s home network might. The funny part is what if that was 50.50.0.0/22? A publisher could in practice replace one user’s IP with another user’s IP which means that they still would be passing PII unanonymized which could violate GDPR.

IPv6 uses the same basic system. 2001:db8:85a3:8d3:1319:8a2e:370:7348 becomes 2001:db8:85a3::. You just truncate at the 64th bit. Rolling through available host bits doesn’t really matter then. IPv6/IPv4 really aren’t ever used for Google user syncing.

I’ve mentioned this elsewhere, but to fair, even without you providing Google an IPv6 address, they still know exactly which computer contacted them from inside your LAN. Even in GDPR territory they can do that.

Yes, that is correct. As I said, there is probably already a docker image out there for the provider you go with.

Pretty sure that is just a discrepancy between when a site has last checked client announcements from the tracker and when what the tracker currently shows. As of 2025, TPB for example links to 3.2 million torrents. Assuming client announcements were set to an average 1hr interval, that would require TPB to make 76.8 million checks every day for announcement updates.

So, I could see sites not maintaining accurate seeder/leecher data.

The only real constraint here is VPN port forwarding. You would need a VPN provider that supports that in order to hit DHT swarms. So, just make sure the provider has that.

As for kill switching, run the VPN and torrent client through docker. There is probably already a docker image out there that does that depending on what provider you go with. Essentially what you’d be doing is sandboxing your torrent client and then only passing in the VPN interface via docker network to that client. If the VPN tunnel goes down there is no other egress point off the network segment and zero chance for traffic using a different interface.

I would only expose a port to the Internet if users other than myself would be needing access to it. Otherwise, I just keep everything inside a tailscale network so I can access remotely. Usually I believe people put a reverse proxy in front of the Jellyfin server and configure your certificates from there. So Jellyfin to proxy is insecure and then proxy to internet is secure. Lets Encrypt is an easy way to do that. And if you are going to expose a port you definitely want fail2ban monitoring that port.

If using tailscale funnels, you can technically skip the certificate part as that’s done for you, but that would take away from the learning experience of setting up a proxy.

But you need that legal banner in case your spouse acts up and you need to throw their ass in prison.

Asking for evidence wasn’t the issue, believing that the truth relies solely upon a discussion providing such evidence is.

Again, post your evidence or didn’t happen. Literally everything after that meaningless without that. The discussion is over because you can’t provide that as you are wrong. End.

Unrelated, but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

So, I’m not allowed to ask you for proof of your statement? And if its unrelated, then why did you post it? Its unrelated. Also, you’re saying you have an absence of evidence, ergo you have no evidence. Having no evidence does not qualify as evidence.

Removing an identifier that is used. (1/100 = matters, “isn’t really used” != unused). This contradicts your other statements:

Just because an identifier exists doesn’t mean it is used. BidRequest.imp[i].tagid exists, but advertisers don’t use it. I think you are confusing having an option with something being mandatory.

And Tor nodes are not the same thing as VPN multi-hop. If you think that they are, wow! VPN multi-hop is you connecting to a provider’s server that connects to another one of the provider’s server then out. It’s all the provider’s network.

And again, if you connected your Firefox browser to Tor, we could still track you. You’d get cookied or localStorage() tracked. When you disconnect from Tor, that stuff is still present in your browser. Almost like the number of hops you take or the IP address used doesn’t seem to really matter, huh?

EDIT: I just realized you think that Tor is built using multi-hop VPN. Its a real life Dunning-Kruger effect! I’ve never encountered this. You are going to do something really stupid and end up in prison.