Naw, this platform is still very buggy so I doubt that it’s your fault.
Naw, this platform is still very buggy so I doubt that it’s your fault.
Wow, that’s crazy weird.
I get the same error, idk why :x
I didn’t expect it to be useful so soon haha. Also, I hate the twitter like interface. I can’t figure out anything and it feels so weird to use. Link aggregators FTW.
I’m asking for the opposite, if your instance allows you to downvote stuff then can you downvote stuff that’s on instances that don’t allow them?
Couldn’t find anything, comment for reach
Can a person outside of instance with disabled downvotes downvote stuff on that instance?
Huh? I thought that it only applies to posts on your instance and not all the interactions that users of this instance can do. Am I wrong?
No, just no
You can request that on lemmit.online if I remeber the name of the instance correctly
I’m sorry for showing up so much there
Pls no, I will lose all my conversations on the topic of imaginary subs that I did under this post lol
Edit: I made a big screenshot of everything, I don’t care about those conversations under this post anymore
I think that I will merge imaginary aviation with imaginary vehicles and I will just give up on the content that’s not vehicles.
i don’t want to end up as some tyrannical ruler of the imaginary network though
No worry, I can do that myself
Alright, inside city/village shots will have their own sublemmy and cityscapes will be moved to scapes.
i wonder if we should make some sort of discussion group with tywele, sebinspace, and remus989 to make co-ordinated decisions?
YESSS, I was already thinking about it but I wasn’t sure how to proceed with that.
Edit: I just realised that merging imaginary soldiers/armies with imaginary characters is not an option because imaginary characters sub focuses on single characters.
i feel like that would need to be clarified before implementing one (or both[^hopefully not])
The dev will write a github issue with everything described for stage 1 of tags before proceeding to gather opinions. But he will only mention stage 2 and stage 3 of tags and I will have to make issues for stage 2 and 3 myself.
yeah this seems fine (although cosmetics seems like a late stage issue to me, but meh)
I would love to have an option for customizing the looks of the tags to make it more easly browsable when you have more than just a few but yeah, it’s not something that would need to be implemented in stage 2.
i’m not surprised, that makes sense. as an aside: there are community id’s? like, uuid’s? or does he mean just comm@instan.ce which is, i guess, an id?
I just found this on github. It was mentioned by nutomic a month ago:
Each Activitypub object (post, comment, user, community) has an ID. In case of posts this looks like https://lemmy.world/post/1 with the domain where the creator is registered. When another instances fetches the post, it inserts it in the db and renders it as a link with the db post.id column value, eg https://lemmy.ml/post/3. So the problem is that the url id is exactly the same as the db id, which naturally differs between instances. A cleaner solution for this would be random IDs as described in #1101. This is what Peertube does for example.
ah yes, convoluted and intermingled subs. fun
Yeah, that would make the sub waaaay too general. I will leave the imaginary aviation as a separate sub but imaginary ships/subs on the other hand is something that I can merge with imaginary vehicles. I also think that I can merge imaginary armies with imaginary characters and just give them their separate tag once they come out. There shouldn’t be a problem with both of those cases.
I also have this weird sublemmy called “imaginary cities/cityscapes/landscapes” because it’s about cities but cityscapes very often are also portraying a landscape. I can either make “imaginary scapes” (ik this sounds weird lol) and use it for starscapes, landscapes, skyscapes, cloudcapes etc. and have a separate sublemmy for showing inside shots of cities/villages where far away shots of them would be counted as a “scapes” to which will be included in “scapes” sublemmy and not the sublemmy about cities/villages. The second option is to include cityscapes in sublemmy about cities and repost artworks to imaginary scapes if it contains a landscape on top of a cityscape. But that would result in a lot of reposts though and this would make the OP very sad. There’s also a third option where I include scapes, cities, cityscapes and villages into one place BUT that’s not the content of the same topic which is a very not cool thing to do. What do you think?
Edit: I also think that I could move imaginary tanks into imaginary vehicles too.
Congrats!
(Also, I was first to hit 3k)