![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/a8975c5a-48a1-4158-8740-699f82a00c2e.webp)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/1be75b15-2f18-429d-acf7-dcea8e512a4b.png)
Your last two paragraphs, especially the last one, feel eerily close to reverse-ism.
“Reverse-ism” usually refers to “reverse discrimination”. It’s a big trope in far-right circles and ties directly to the “Great replacement” theory.
It’s unclear what your intentions were when you said this but it felt weird.
Right, I might’ve been more confused with your previous to last paragraph because using she/her pronoun as ‘default’ was and is a genuine feminist practice in French where gender neutrality is more difficult.
Anyhow, I would recommend not arguing your points like that - it just kinda smells like bad faith argumentation.
Yes, that would be correct. It’s the basis of the Great replacement theory.