“We are now confirming once again that playing with fire—and they are like small children playing with matches—is a very dangerous thing for grown-up uncles and aunts who are entrusted with nuclear weapons in one or another Western country.”
So countries with nuclear capabilities should be more responsible and perhaps not invade their neighboring countries? 🤔
Allowing a literal child with 0 medical training/education to drill into/near a vital organ of someone experiencing an acute head injury while they are unconscious and without their consent? Naw, nothing wrong there at all.
Disney backpeddeled on that argument because of the PR nightmare. But the damage is done
My brain does not like. It’s stunlocked asking “why is this bold?” over and over again even though I already answered.
Every three months we get new battery hype…
You’re good for another 7 atleast 👍
Tell me what you found out!?
I want the Tiger King type documentary on his presidency. It was absolutely insane day in and day out for years.
It kind of looks like it’s attempting to PXE boot from the network to me.
If they were compatible with the charger they use at home, it wouldn’t be nearly as wasteful as they’ll need one there anyway
Ford, Rivian, and I think GM all have had deals to use the Tesla network this year.
What an idiot, you can’t even not punish yourself too much
Failed that roll? Reroll for only 300 Haswidgets.
That’s $5 in USD
That’s a fucking sobering statistic
Not sure if you are talking about programming or woodworking
I average 6k and am very sedentary 😬
Average 18 breaths a minute 60 minutes an hour 24 hours in a day
$1296
You make more if you walk more than 5184 steps a day. Which you probably do
I ain’t afraid of no goats
Why do her legs look like AI?
There is a trauma surgeon in the article stating she shouldn’t have even been allowed in the room, let alone allowed to drill into a patient’s skull.
Is it less ethical or more ethical if the patient had given informed consent?
No patient gives consent to who is helping in the surgery because there is an implicit understanding that it will only be performed by qualified licensed personnel. There are multiple regulating bodies that prevent unqualified people from practicing in a professional setting. So, it is not unreasonable to make this assumption.
My argument is that it would be one thing if this was a simple superficial elective surgery where the patient consented to allowing the doctor’s unqualified child “to give it a go” popping a pimple or something. It is significantly worse because it was a life-threatening emergency procedure where the doctor elected to increase the likelihood of failure/harm/death while the patient was in a position where they couldn’t consent to the doctor taking that unnecessary risk.