![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/b13dd487-9001-491f-b5b2-60fe23af667a.png)
simply put it into a canon.
simply put it into a canon.
idk i’ve never been to one but it’s clothing optional, so it’s up to the kids and the parents ig.
clothing optional*
see thats weird, i read that comment, not one mention of “naked kids” being there, just “kids” being there…
how do you even know the kids are allowed to be nude there?
yea no it definitely did.
so true bestie, so true
uh oh. I think i might need some health insurance before that event.
no, because they’re the supreme court, and they’re appointed for life.
it’s only contempt, from my understanding of law it’s not uncommon for contempt of court, and inter court violations to be anywhere from like 2 weeks of jail time, to a few months.
since people are yelling about it.
It’s probably not blatantly bypassing security and privacy features, what it is PROBABLY doing is using the user to bypass them by simply manipulating them to do it.
Social engineering is way easier than whatever bullshit you would need to do to bypass sandboxing and dynamically recompile, or whatever people are claiming, and my guess would be that this is what they’re doing.
If the suit is claiming they are doing what i said, that’s probably legal, and not going anywhere, unless tiktok ban bill 2.0. If the suit is claiming what others are claiming, it’s still probably wrong and probably going to be tiktok ban bill 2.0.
Unfortunately these things aren’t all that exciting at the end of the day.
one of the most obvious ways is to simply not bypass them, and then do it from within the application itself. That way you can essentially man in the middle the rest of it, though this would require a rather specific set of events and a particularly nested design of an app.
if true this is huge.
Tax actually gaming a little hard
this is rather ominous
unfortunately you may be right, but the onion also has a very specific type of title that they write out, and this was pretty close.
i don’t think you understand insurance.
yeah, i’m not big into hunting frankly, if i did own one it would be for either sport, or personal protection since middle of fucking nowhere.
Likely not a huge issue, but it’s definitely something to consider being in america already i suppose.
it can be cheaper that way for a lot of reasons, you might not be in network, your insurance might not want to cover it, there might be a million other factors, often times it’s just easier, and cheaper to go somewhere else, do that shit, pay out of pocket, go home, feel better, and then start working again.
Generally people aren’t too keen on working when trying to figure out if they have cancer or something, for example.
bro i thought this was an onion post for a second what the fuck just happened
i would presume that would be what one is to do. It seems the logical solution here.