![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/75f90336-f369-44a4-9aa4-d8154702c0a0.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/045a2049-eb61-4960-88ba-97e7f1ffbf31.jpeg)
I honestly forgot that this game existed. I remember it being very well made, but I could never fully get into it for some reason.
All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
I honestly forgot that this game existed. I remember it being very well made, but I could never fully get into it for some reason.
That’s an interesting idea, but I feel that it overcomplicates things without much benefit.
I apologize if I’ve offended you, as that wasn’t my intention — I’m only trying to understand your opinion. I’m aware that we have different opinions, I’m just curious what your rationale is for yours.
replying in individual comments is stupid and more confusing.
For clarity, would you mind explicitly stating why you believe that atomic comments are intrinsically more confusing?
Ha, I didn’t notice that in the thumbnail. Very interesting indeed, if it is a 22 degree halo!
Would you mind elaborating?
For sure. What the aforementioned bits of information provide is the ability to be confident in the privacy of software if one were to treat it as a black box, ie an average consumer.
Hm, I feel that it’s inaccurate to say “we wouldn’t be able to tell”. It’s not exactly a black box system — the app would have to run on an operating system, and if you are able to know what the operating system is doing, and what instructions are being executed by the CPU, then you can know exactly what the app is doing.
What the aforementioned bits of information provide is the ability to treat software as a black box and be sure of its safety without having to fundamentally audit it.
If this is in reply to the second quote, then I’m not really sure what point you are trying to make. You appear to be opposed to atomic comments because you don’t want to scroll for context, but the alternative, which I outlined, is a comment containing quotes for context — and to solve what you are describing, you would require the entire thread to be contained within the comment, which would still require scrolling. Neither option really addresses your complaint. Imo, atomic comments come the closest, as the scope is kept restricted per thread.
You could have support for this thing in the board’s software, but I don’t think it’s common. So normally, where a post will have at least a header, sometimes also a footer, multiple posts means duplicated data on screen. Pretty minor though.
Support for what? I’m not entirely sure what you are referring to with this section.
I think it fragments the workflow a bit because normally you can just quote a block and easily interject your replies + add more quote syntax. If it were multiple posts you’d need to repeat certain steps each time. Personally I want to minimize switches between keyboard and mouse. On mobile it’s more even.
That’s a fair point. Replies do sometimes rely on fragments of information from the entire post, but, even still, one could still just contain that within an atomic reply, but yeah, it would need to be repeated for each part. Personally I’m not bothered by the increase in actions. Generally, one isn’t commenting in a large enough volume for that sort of efficiency concern to really matter, imo.
Empty on Thunder.
I generally try and pick few of the strongest points and reply to those.
This is one possibility, but it’s quite flawed, as you end up losing portions of the conversation.
It’s impossible to debate someone who replies back as you demonstrated above.
It may require more effort, but it’s far from impossible. And that’s precisely the reason why I outlined the second alternative that has atomic comments.
I thought Kenobi was rather awful. Probably some of the worst writing and directing to come out of a major production company.
Imo, The Acolyte hasn’t been that bad so far. It’s not amazing, mind you, and it still suffers from the plague of mediocrity that seems to be going around in the new movies and shows that have been coming out, but it’s definitely watchable. The set and costume design are great, the acting is alright, directing is alright, but the writing has been rather hit or miss so far.
I would be curious what the actual political distribution is on Lemmy. Though, I think It would be very tough to accurately survey that.
Finally, a good meme utilizing the Gadsden Flag. That’s a fair criticism of libertarianism, imo.
We’re constantly running out; but every fes years, we figure out a new way to extract more oil/make do with the addresses we currently have.
It’s a supply and demand situation. We run out of things not only when they are physically exhausted, but also when it’s not economically viable to find ways to make more. But when demand increases enough, it will eventually become economically viable again.
Yeah, it definitely rehashed the trope, but I still think that movie is underrated.