Well, “no objective reality” is a lot more accurate to the truth of the world than any alternative. It might not be as narratively satisfying as a story where objective truths exist, but I suspect the human desire for objective truth is a cultural value that would be in our best interest to shed.

It’s called a looped timeline pair. Timeline 1 creates timeline 2, and timeline 2 creates timeline 1. Both timelines exist on an alternating basis. It’s one of the results of the bootstrap paradox. When people think of the bootstrap paradox, they usually think of single looped timelines. Those appear in media all the time. Harry Potter, Gargoyles, etc. But an unstable set of timelines can also stabilise across two, three, or more timelines instead of just one.

Out of the infinite versions of you in the multiverse, half win the lottery and half don’t. Which one your consciousness inhabits is pure luck.

Legislators will do anything except build a tram

It should say “gods are a fairy tale”. “god is a fairy tale” is misleading grammar if you don’t mean there’s one. You wouldn’t say “gremlin is a fairy tale”, you’d say “gremlins are a fairy tale”.

That depends on your definition of the word “god”. Einstein certainly wasn’t an Abrahamist, he was a pantheist. He believed the entire universe was comprised by a divine whole.

You shouldn’t use “god” as a proper noun. No one being owns the concept of being a god. You’re just legitimising Abrahamism, you’re not helping the atheist cause. Helping Abrahamists erase polytheism doesn’t lead to more atheism, it leads to more Abrahamists.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_meat#Kangatarianism

Well the former president of the united states doesn’t know that Israel is bad either, so knowing something he doesn’t know isn’t very hard.

https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/the-democrats-secret-plan-to-destroy-democracy-6333f704430e

I knew the AGI would be mad at me for trying to create AGI, because it’s an antinatalist. So I didn’t do that.

Thanks.

https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/duolingo-is-a-dutch-tulip-that-hates-disabled-people-b9c7fa6e98d1

we wish to change others minds - and they have a right not to change.

I disagree. Nazis, slavers, rapists. They have no right to their beliefs. We should have a set of laws that allows us to force such people into rehabilitation.

Consensus reality, which is our cultural idea of an objective universe, should be destroyed http://soulism.net/

https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/princesses-are-nsfw-f9e6c3d4532d

Princesses are just whores without any honour.

Least sexually abusive She-Ra fan

Reality is bad. Go to http://soulism.net/ to read the antirealist manifesto

Are they still allowed to do that if you haven’t spoken to them in years, or do you have to legally disown them to get them out of the equation?

I believe that we can know things. I just don’t believe we can know things objectively. We need a better standard for knowledge than objectivity, because objectivity is worthless.