We can’t have shit under capitalism. The only rights Nintendo recognizes is your right to give them money.
We can’t have shit under capitalism. The only rights Nintendo recognizes is your right to give them money.
It’s not looking good.
The animation stuff you mentioned exists today:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gt1yNJ180Cs
Is this an attempt to beat those monopoly allegations?
They tried to make video game rentals illegal in the US. They’ve always been a shitty, anti-consumer company.
Nintendo has always been an underhanded bully. This isn’t new.
You can never learn anything with these clickbait headlines.
Why do you have it?
Or just not show people what you’re typing.
That whole page is full of wild shit.
I can’t tell if this is a joke or not.
A computer like that is useful outside of work. I’d pay for it out of pocket if I had to.
You keep moving the goal posts and putting words in my mouth. I never said you can do new things out of nothing. Nothing I mentioned is approaching, equaling, or exceeding the effort of training a model.
You haven’t answered a single one of my questions, and you are not arguing in good faith. We’re done here. I can’t say it’s been a pleasure.
Do you have any examples of how they fail? There are plenty of ways to explain new concepts to models.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19427 https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11643 https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12962 https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06425 https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18922 https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01300
What kind of creativity are you talking about then? I’ve also never heard of a bloated model. Which models are bloated?
But at what point does that guidance just become the dataset you removed from the training data?
The whole point is that it didn’t know the concepts beforehand, and no it doesn’t become the dataset. Observations made of the training data are added to the model’s weights after training, the dataset is never relevant again as the model’s weights are locked in.
To get it to run Doom, they used Doom.
To realize a new genre, you’ll “just” have to make that game the old fashion way, first.
Or you could train a more general model. These things happen in steps, research is a process.
There are more forms of guidance than just raw words. Just off the top of my head, there’s inpainting, outpainting, controlnets, prompt editing, and embeddings. The researchers who pulled this off definitely didn’t do it with text prompts.
Someone dumb enough could easily flatten someone backing up with that bug.