I’m shocked. Disgusted. Kind of aroused.
I’m shocked. Disgusted. Kind of aroused.
Thanks, I hate it.
This is my favorite right now. It’s called Warnings.
What does this mean?
The question is inadequatly phrased. You must describe what kind of sandwich we are speaking of. Unless op is speaking about cold sandwiches exclusively, many sandwiches require cooking.
Croque Monsieur
Grilled Cheese
Cubano
Monte Cristo
Panini
These are just a few that I came up with off the top of my head. I’m sure there are many more.
So small of government that it fits right in your uterus.
30 suspected illegal votes out of 25 million!!! Fucking what are we doing here?
Oh, there were plenty of people throwing a fit about it back in the 90s too. The only difference is no one had social media to go find one another and rile each other up. The few foaming at the month couldn’t shout loud enough. You should have heard my bio dad at the time frothing he couldn’t walk into the grocery with a lit cigarette. Apparently the communists had won.
When they can is the key phrase. When the law says you can’t it’s no longer a doctors problem. This is 100% on the stupid politics.
I read the site but couldn’t find why the sign says 12’4 if it’s really 11’8"?
Edit: Thanks for all the answers everyone. Now the 11’8"+8" makes so much more sense.
Thank you for pointing out someone added Sadam. I had to do a “Where’s Sadam” double take. I didn’t get the title at first but now it makes sense.
Older Millennial here. I also grew up as technology did. Thank you for reading my T.E.D. talk today.
The gun was not full auto.
Omg 😲 there really is an animal with the name of two other animals as it’s name. Thanks girlfreddy. This made my morning.
But that’s why the father is being prosecuted. Because he ultimately gifted the firearm to his teenager. Your original statement was about unsecured firearms. I was pointing out this is not a case of “teenager breaks into house and gets a gun.” This is about a father letting their 14 year old have a gun.
What’s a racoon dog?
It does matter. The teenager was the owner. Even if the gun was secure it would have been accessible to the teenager. The gun was gifted to the teenager and that is the problem. The teenager should not have position of a fire arm, that we both agree on. Stating that the gun should have been secure completely ignores the actual scenario here.
It wasn’t that he didn’t secure the gun. It’s that he gifted it to the teen directly.
What am I looking at and why are you calling me Agan?