It’s 10p EST and I’m still waiting for more 😔
It’s 10p EST and I’m still waiting for more 😔
BRING BACK THE FUCKING BUTTONS HOLY SHIT
Or get a black friend ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
You fucker :(
Ain’t even gotta do that, just imagine he suffered for 500,000 years and he did, just like everyone and everything you ever knew was created last Thursday
There’s more to transactions than the purchase of goods and services.
Donating money is a transaction. Using counterfeit money to donate while claiming it is legal tender makea the donation fraudulent.
Crawl back under your bridge, mate.
Actually it is inherently illegal. It’s fraud.
Because like the previous person said, they’re attempting to pass it off as legal tender by getting the homeless person the money so they’ll use it.
Yeah, not sure why folks care
I can sue discord and there’s nothing their EULA can do to stop me.
God bless our right to litigate*
*terms and conditions apply: enough money to win in a battle of attrition
Currently using blokada. Any reason to switch?
WE ARE EARTHICAN!
Yeah, nah, fuck water. I’m good
The ambiguity doesn’t lie in they, it lies in the way the writer constructed that sentence, as the person you responded to already stated.
The writer (and the person they are communicating with) knows the plurality of the “who”, an outside observer (us, the readers) aren’t privy to that information. Clarification on the part of the writer would provide that context. But the sentence isn’t written to be read to a 3rd party, but the other party (the person the writer is communicating with).
99.99% of people understand this intuitively, but this is the way you’d parse the understanding of that sentence.
And if you’ll note, in my second sentence, “they” is understood to be singular—the writer.
E: and for Shits n’ giggles: if neither party (the writer nor the person being communicated to) knows the plurality of the “who” they are referring to, then it’s irrelevant information. They will discover who wrote it when they go searching.
And if you’ll note, in that previous sentence, it’s understood that I am using the plural they (the writer and the person being communicated to) in both uses of the last sentence.
Singular “They” is literally almost as old as the word “They” itself.
People have gotten by using it for almost 700 years.
I can’t. I need it in 7.62 NATO
You know what? Fuck it, 6 more years of 2020.
ONLY GOT 3 PIXELS. NEXT.
Sorry for the reddit link
3 older sisters, 1 younger sister.
Haven’t spoken to the oldest in over 5 years. No hate, she’s just 10 years older than me, has 5 or 6 kids, and lived halfway across the US for my entire life.
2nd oldest and I talk at least monthy. We’re the closest. Twin and I talk once every couple of months.
Little sister and I haven’t spoken in months, and even then we rarely talk to each other and she has never been the first one to initiate contact. We fought a lot growing up, relationship got a little better after moving out, and now I have no idea what her issue is.
Today’s her birthday, I have no intention of reaching out. She’s engaged, I have no interest in attending the wedding. She went no contact first, I just have given up trying to reach out and maintain a relationship she clearly doesn’t want.
I like you.
I eat you last.