No, because he was no longer the chancellor when he was fired from his position as a professor.
He had 2 jobs, chancellor and professor. He was previously fired from the role of chancellor. He has now been fired from his role as professor.
RAFO.
The sentence, although confusing, is correct.
I think you’re approach is generally correct, but you’ve made a few errors which make it hard to follow (e.g. mixing up suit and denomination).
However, method two is only more efficient if onky a few cards will be drawn. If nearly the entire deck is drawn or dealt, then 1 is superior. Method 1 can be done with two lists and a random number generator. The length of the 2 lists will always sum to 52 and the RNG is used to decide the order that cards are removed from the first list and added to the 2nd. It requires generating at most 51 random numbers.
That should be true for any company’s projects though. That’s just saying that the net present value needs to be positive. There’s no way most of their projects have been negative NPV.
Has any square Enix game in the past 5 years met their expectations?
This is usually the problem with them. They have great selling games, that always fall short of their “expectations”. I’m wondering if their expectations might be wrong.
I’ll start by saying do not do this, but even if it was wired wrong and neutral was connected to hot and everything was properly insulated, then the breaker would trigger pretty quickly since it would be a short.
If the breaker is faulty, then there could be a bigger issue, but that’s fairly unlikely.
Not to mention some (many) games include a social aspect which appeals to a significant portion of the audience (maybe not to all, but to many).
When you are done with Bob’s, you can do space exploration, or pyanodon’s if you hate yourself.
You want flaming for improper grammar, you have 2 flagrant violations in this post which absolutely does not detract from your message. You better continue going about your day not being bothered by this at all. Geez!
(I’m sure I made mistakes here too, go ahead)
Have you seen the Tom Scott video?
If it works for hamsters may be a properly built one could work for people, but there’s absolutely no ethical way to test that.
Unfortunately, this is one of those fun ideas that simply won’t ever be possible. Even if we start with the easy one of just breaking chemical bonds, those bonds exist because it reduces the total energy of the system.
To “disrupt” those bonds, energy must be supplied, and to do it for even a small amount of material would require a tremendous amount of energy. Delivering that much energy over a distance just isn’t possible because atmosphere in between would also be “disrupted”. The disrupted material would also fly apart at high speeds and high temperatures. So any type of “ray” or “gun” would just turn into a bomb with a pistol grip trigger. I expect that the user experience testing would have lots of very negative reviews.
Don’t give them free advertising then.
Do you mean geologic, not geographic?
How does that work though? Sedimentary rocks formed in the last 100 years must be way deeper than any of the soil that could be affected by the atmosphere?
Or am I overthinking this and you’re saying that there’s an indicator in recent soil deposits that correlates to radioactive testing.
No, it’s a goof on my part. I forgot what season Harmon was out.
Community can have some really great writing (dips in season 3 4, but recovers in 4 5).
30 Rock, Parks and Rec (particularly picks up once two new members join the cast), the Good Place, and Brooklyn 99 are all usually pretty light hearted and fun.
Scrubs can be very funny, but also has some somber episodes where you’ll find some of the best writing is the series. Generally more fun than grim though.
The writing quality in how I met your mother was good for the first few seasons, but dropped off in the latter half.
Friends was pretty consistent, but not as good as some of these others, for me at least.
The Oreville is inspired by Star Trek, particularly shows like the Next Generation. That’s a good series with some great episodes, but has some filler lower quality between. Not as silly as the Oreville, but some are still fun. Others are interesting or exciting in a variety of ways.
I haven’t watched What We Do In The Shadows, but it is on my list for the same reason you asked the question.
I think a lot of that stuff is people buying items in bulk off alibaba, rebranding it, and listing. Most of it is crap, but that’s how stuff like it can be so cheaply produced, it’s one or two factories producing at scale.
As an example, UW Madison which has a fairly large and profitable athletics program generated 12 million in profit last year. They aren’t the largest athletics program in the country, but it is bigger than many. Sits around the middle.
The patents and IP owned by the university provided $134 million in grants and support. Again, the school has a large STEM component, but it isn’t a top tier university. Again, sits around the middle. The organization providing this funding manages its investments carefully and intends to provide this level of funding year after year.
Research departments generated more revenue and the funding is likely more reliable.
As long as they do not interact with any other particles then yes.
Remember, in the photon’s frame of reference (i.e. It’s point of view), time does not progress. So it is created and destroyed in the same moment. Any distance traveled for any amount of time in our reference frame, happens instantaneously for the photon.
Was this just a plug for the service you’re trying to sell?
The post seems like a blatantly obvious sales pitch.