![](https://media.kbin.social/media/7b/73/7b732752f041579aac207c81d8937be6ed45676f071a674cc378abdd276d16cf.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
No, most of the debt is owned domestically by the people
No, most of the debt is owned domestically by the people
I’m more of an elliptical orbit kinda guy. Sometimes I almost get it but most of the time the point just keeps getting farther and farther away.
What you are referring to is known as Appeasement and, historically, has been a bad idea.
I don’t run, but when I do it’s not at the 18 mile mark but the 3 minute mark where my bodies like “it’s all gotta go”
Right. That’s the point. Keep the law vague for selective enforcement
Nah, there is always more Intel to be gained. We’ve seen how Russia fares against those weapon systems and now it’s a question of how will they change their strategy? If the US makes a prediction about new Russian doctrine, will the US assessment be accurate or does the US intelligence apparatus need to rethink it’s analysis procedure. In a conflict heavy with drone usage, what can we learn about their use and more importantly, countermeasures, both on the adversarial side and blue side.
Anyway my point is that there is always more to learn from your opponent.
Mostly because the US has to actually develop and research new weapon technology and China just copies everything so they don’t need to spend as much.
I think that was the Super Max 8?
Two things here. One is that you are confusing New York and New York City. I absolutely do believe an entire state can manage better than a city. The second thing is that Texas and other border states do receive federal funds for managing the border. Not as much as maybe they require but they do get federal help.
Does it matter? Endlessly pontificating about the true nature of reality serves no purpose. If I’m driving and I’m about to hit a tree, reality doesn’t give a single fuck if I consider “well maybe the tree isn’t really there. How can I truly know?”
Like, I was talking with a guy and he was saying shit about how can we truly know that what I say is the color green is the same as what you see? It just feels mastubatory. It’s what words are for. If that guy asks me to go to the store and buy forest green paint from a certain brand and I come back with forest green paint from that brand he’s not going to worry about whether or not we see the exact same shade.
I had to listen to a guy talk about the fanfic he was writing for 4 hours. So anything but that I suppose.
Ah. The forgotten lands, according to some maps.
It’s not about how people vote. It’s about getting people to vote. Emotionally charged people are more likely to vote/volunteer/donate etc.
I’m talking out of my ass by the way, I have nothing to prove any of this.
My pet theory is that this was said specifically to destabilize the US. As others have said, this is not new. China has been saying this for a long time. But 100% the GOP is going to call Biden weak for not shutting Xi down and instead saying the US supports a "One China Policy " without any critical thought as to what the dynamics are.
This is to fire up the right wing base.
I thought the same thing. Here’s the archived Texas Observer article on it, which is what this article’s source seems to be.
Apparently the principal heard from another student that this kid was “making threats” against her. Sounds pretty thin to me.
I’m not even mad. I’m impressed, that’s amazing.
That post is outstanding and is a wonderful writeup that highlights the danger of associating with a company as morally bankrupt as Meta.
Thank you for your service.