• dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re not describing composition.

    Go Files do not “hasa reader”. You don’t do file.reader.read(), you just do file.read(), that’s inheritance as file has inherited the read() method.

    • colonial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re confusing polymorphism for inheritance. read is a method on an interface that File implements - it is not inherited from a base class. You can use that File directly, or wherever a Reader interface (or whatever the name is, idk I don’t really do Go) is expected.

    • orangeboats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Composition do not necessitate the creation of a new field like x.reader or x.writer, what are you on?

        • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Man, I honestly have no idea why they are downvoting you. Composition literally means taking common behavior and placing it in external objects behind interfaces using a has-a relationship.

          No idea why they are denying this. Inheritance vs composition is the same as “is-a” vs “has-a”. In composition re usability isn’t done via inheritance but code encapsulation.

          Saying that in Go objects can implement many interfaces is the Interface Segregation principle from SOLID. Basically having small interfaces instead of a big interface with methods that may not be implemented by all implementors.