• usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s an interesting problem. We want people to ideally just drive less, and use EVs when they do, but EVs are heavier for the same vehicle and don’t buy fuel that’s usually taxed to help cover vehicle infrastructure costs. So they can cause extra wear and don’t pay for it. I’m not sure how to solve that future problem other than tolls maybe?

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Same way we can fund everything else: tax the rich, cut mitary spending.

      • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That doesn’t solve the issue though… We want to tie driving more to paying more.

        Right now, fuel taxes work decently well as heavier vehicles tend to burn more and the more you drive the more fuel you need too. EVs don’t operate the same way, and we don’t want electricity in general more expensive to cover roads as that doesn’t encourage people to drive less.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          “We want to tie driving more to paying more.”

          Why? Because it’s fair? I don’t really give a shit if it’s fair, we need functioning infrastructure and incentivizing people to pay less into that system is counterproductive.

          Being expensive demonstrably does not reduce driving in any significant way. The near-total lack of functional alternatives needs to be addressed.