• Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    What do you currently do if a developer doesn’t package their software for other distros? Maybe they only provide an AUR package or a .deb, so someone else has to package it.

    With flatpak the only difference is that a distro independent package exists, that anyone can install. It being possible to do cross-distro apps with a single package doesn’t make it any harder for distros to also package it.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m not arguing against flatpaks I’m just calling the number suspect to meaningless as a metric.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Thanks, I think I understand now what you mean. I still disagree on the notion that people are forced to use flatpak and that the number is meaningless because of that. People choose to use flatpak because it solves their problem.

        I’d say it’s similar to many people who use Ubuntu because of its big user base and software support. It’s still an achievement to be recognized.

        Anyway, I do agree that the number itself isn’t really relevant. I’m pretty tired and maybe I’m a bit pedantic, so good night (or have a nice day, depending on your timezone).