Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoNightshade, the free tool that ‘poisons’ AI models, is now available for artists to useventurebeat.comexternal-linkmessage-square276fedilinkarrow-up1865arrow-down146cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1819arrow-down1external-linkNightshade, the free tool that ‘poisons’ AI models, is now available for artists to useventurebeat.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square276fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·9 months agoProbably the reason they’re moving to a Web offering. They could just take down the binary files and be gpl compliant, this whole thing is so stupid
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·9 months agoI think that’s what AGPL tries to prevent
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 months agoYes, but if the code they took is not AGPL then this loophole still applies
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 months agoYes, I meant more that AGPL was created to plug this particular loophole. As in, if it was AGPL, they couldn’t do this.
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-29 months agoThat’s true Although I personally am not a fan of licences this strict, MIT+Apache2.0 seems good enough for me. Of course, that might change with time and precedents like this 😅
Probably the reason they’re moving to a Web offering. They could just take down the binary files and be gpl compliant, this whole thing is so stupid
I think that’s what AGPL tries to prevent
Yes, but if the code they took is not AGPL then this loophole still applies
Yes, I meant more that AGPL was created to plug this particular loophole. As in, if it was AGPL, they couldn’t do this.
That’s true
Although I personally am not a fan of licences this strict, MIT+Apache2.0 seems good enough for me. Of course, that might change with time and precedents like this 😅