• FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t think that last sentence paints the full picture, despite being catchy.

    More often, things turn bad for a slew of different reasons.

    Let’s take the situation of abortion rights as an example. The people that have advocated for the end of all abortions in the US never believed abortion brought anything positive. It’s not about history being forgotten, it’s about a conflict between two groups of people having different opinions, and one imposing their belief on the other group.

    I’m not saying this to sound smart. But identifying the proper reasons explaining a bad societal change helps determine where to target counter-actions.

    • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      And how are those people getting more and more people on their side? Not teaching history.

      Book bannings, going against CRT, stuff like that. Makes it easier in the long run at least

      • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s besides the point. Your original formulation lets people think that everybody believed that abortion rights were a good thing at some point in history. Which is false.

        The christofascists were always salty about their defeat. They waited until they were powerful enough to strike back, using mechanisms that are too complex to detail here.

        While education is part of the retaliation against christofascism (and not just history education), Americans will need more than history books to fight back. This is far too simplistic.

        Knowing who the enemy is - and there are identifiable enemies in this case - is crucial. And I think the saying you mentioned in your first comment is a bit of a thought-terminating cliché.

        It sounds great, but it’s kinda garbage.