Any critiques, desire for clarity, outright hatred, whatever have you. I will respond the best I can.
I know there’s been some blowback on some of the policy updates but it’s been difficult to really explain fully that the restrictive content policy is temporary, this community was very unmanaged for a time and it had to be reigned in somehow and with the limited tools at disposal the temporary policy changes were made.
Here’s a comment that also explains a little bit behind the decisions made recently as well.
For community mods, we have a community mod coord matrix group chat now. Feel free to DM about it.
Also, there’s another ongoing discussion regarding SFW communities on lemmyNSFW here.
I feel like the admins are disproportionately biased against drawn/hentai artwork.
A lot of the gonewild communities here are allowing unverified reposted images, and I’d venture a random guess that maybe 30% of the content is posted without the model’s knowledge or permission, which poses issues with privacy/consent law (etc).
So why ban hentai scat/bestiality communities yet leave the actually illegal communities untouched? If the admins were as strict with IRL content as they were with hentai, all of these legally questionable communities should be “temporarily” banned until better moderation tools exist.
There’s clearly a double standard here that exists.
werent you the one who mass reported my posts, and on one of them even said “its rape becouse the character would never do this in the anime”? while I agree the rules arent great right now. your not exactly helping
I haven’t been mass reporting. I browse local and report anything that I see is loli/noncon. It’s not just your communities.
EDIT: Receipts from the past 30 minutes of browsing; how many of these are by you, @paddedperson?
“Reason: Noncon Report - Hayaska Ai would not agree/consent to this”
Which you followed up with :
“…Rape is any form of nonconsensual sexual activity. Is there any indication at all from any source material that this character would consensually get pierced and used as a sex slave? By default, it’s nonconsensual.”
there doesnt have to be cannon/ in source explanations for hentai for it to be consensual. and none of the admins/mods have said there needs to be.
I know you’ve accused me of “mass reporting”, but it’s because you post a shit ton of questionable content. Like I just submitted a report on this post.
How on earth does this look like consent to anyone? The girl is literally getting shot up with drugs by the mafia.
I think the reason I thought you were mass reporting is becouse you reported every character in a school girl outfit you see. So I spend the time researching and verifying their age, then come back to another report that I have to dig through and verify and most the time they have been legal, or ocs without a defined age ik which they are clearly drawn above age.
Tldr I hit a bunch of false positives so I got a not great impression. I still responded to each of your reports, you just weren’t happy with alot of them.
I’m really only following the rules as they are written.
On the sidebar, it says that CNC is only allowed if there is something in the image that clearly indicates that it’s consensual.
For this piece of artwork, there is not that.
Moreover, the character in the picture canonically would probably never agree to getting her clitoris pierced and used as a sex slave. The subject matter is extreme enough to doubt that the scene is consensual.
EDIT: If this isn’t noncon, then it’s impossible to have any objective criteria to identify noncon artwork that distinguishes it from CNC. Rapehentai is filled with artwork just like this.