The claim is a major departure for the service, which has long been known as a destination for posting short snippets of text.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Lol, twitter was brilliant when it was 144 character text messages. Then it got ruined by adding photos. Now it is going the rest of the way down the tubes by becoming becoming video first. Ugh.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh yea back when it needed that limit because the whole point was to text it over SMS and you could post with any SMS capable phone lol

      That was fun and unique, now it’s just…boring? Just another social media site, it’s only defining thing is it’s (declining) size and reach

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        8 months ago

        SMS was the original reason, but the side effect of forcing people to condense their thoughts into a couple sentences was pretty wonderful. Especially for an open ended community where anyone can talk about anything.

        • Chriswild@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I disagree with you simply because brevity is nice but not at the expense of nuance. Having to try to follow a string of tweets because one simply can’t suffice is awful.

        • flipht@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Wonderful in theory, but in practice it’s a dumpster fire. Quick, mainstreamm-acceptable takes are incentived, and nuanced, alternative viewpoints are nearly impossible.

          If it were all for hobby stuff, it would be fine, but when this is how most people get their news, it’s not good.

    • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hey at least photos worked…

      Video playback doesn’t work half the time, and the other half the time it insists on 140p playback and then freezes.

      They’re doubling down on something they’ve been failing at for years.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      And with this brilliant move they are going to increase bandwidth and storage expenses. There’s a reason why it’s so hard to compete with YouTube.