• Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m super against abuses in scales but this one isn’t that bad. It wouldn’t have changed too much but yes, it’s slightly deceptive to track it as what looks like 10x the growth instead of 5

      • reallynotnick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s half way up a line at the start of the graph, and the end of the graph is at 8 lines tall, so by my math I’d say it looks like 16x vs roughly the actual ~4x improvement.

        • Saneless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I almost said 15 actually but figured 10 would be fine :)

          Thanks for the more structured approach to my baseless guess