• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Discriminate against browsers.

    And I did write that it would be too hard to enforce. I’m a software developer so I understand that it’s more complicated than it sounds.

    • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I agree with the spirit of what you’re saying, but they aren’t really discriminating against browsers at all. As far as I understand it, they pretty much have an

      if (!adPageElement.isLoaded)
      {
          showStupidPopup();
      }
      

      in there somewhere. It doesn’t rely on any nefarious browser implementation-specific extensions; everyone gets that same code and runs it. As for the 5 seconds thing, IIRC some FF configurations were triggering false positives, but I think it was patched. It does seem awfully convenient, and maybe they only patched it because they got caught, but they also must have been morons to think something that obvious wouldn’t be noticed immediately.

    • yiliu@informis.land
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think they claimed they’re not discriminating against browsers, they’re just better at identifying adblockers on Firefox or something.