• Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This law essentially gives special rights to corporate news websites. It allows them to have the benefits of being public source (indexing, sharing, previews, accessibility etc.) but they can choose not to bare the costs of public information. This shitty law should have been a copyright framework ammendment that applies to all IP but instead it’s a clear example of regulatory capture.

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What do you mean they can choose not to bear the costs of public information?

      Every law ever created should have been better

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        People opposed to a link tax are opposed to the concept, not the implementation.