• Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    What you are describing is deflation and it’s only happened twice during the history of the United States. It is also generally looked at as a bad thing.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Is inflation generally looked at as a good thing or a bad thing? Ive only ever heard people complain about inflation.

      If they are both bad things im willing to give the bad thing that improves my life a try over the bad thing that makes everything more expensive.

      Granted i have nothing so im probably on the side of things that is least effected by the bad side of deflation.

      If i can spend more money on the things i want to, it will absolutely help small local businesses near me

      • pixeltree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        A small amount of inflation is healthy. You REALLY want to avoid deflation, because that means the value of your money is increasing. If people know their money will be worth more in the future, they won’t spend it, incentivized to save and sit on it. That means on average everyone spends less, slowing the economy down and starting into a recession/depression.

        Gonna slap this with the good old “I am not an economist” disclaimer, juat what I remember from economics class in high school

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Only problem that right now people also may decide against buying because they can’t afford it. Also, I’m not sure world is producing goods at a healthy rate either, more like we’ve got a bit of an overproduction

          • pixeltree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, obviously wages SHOULD be keeping up with inflation and inflation should be a low, stable amount. That’s the problem, not inflation in general.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          What you learned in high school puts you miles ahead of 99% of these comments

          • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            People still have to spend money, hoarding wealth makes no sense if you can’t eat and pay for services and utilities.

            • krakenx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              The idea is that deflation affects the investor class. Assuming a “healthy” 3% inflation rate, the value of your savings decreases by 3% per year. That means you lose money if you can’t invest in something earning more than 3%. Traditionally interest rates have been around 0%, which means bonds and savings accounts also pay 0%. So, your only options to not lose the value of your savings is to invest in the stock market, risky businesses, or real estate.

              As a middle class person that means that it mostly affects my 401k, but for millionaires and billionaires, deflation means that they would sit on their hoard instead of investing it. Traditionally that means no funding for new businesses, inventions and ideas, and that’s also why the investor class pays much lower taxes than the working classes.

              But nowadays “investment” seems to mostly be buying good companies and enshitifying them or bribing politicians, so maybe it would be better if we encouraged the rich to sit on their money instead of using it to make society worse.