A 10-year-old boy was shot dead in front of his Omaha, Nebraska, home on Thursday night—allegedly by his own father.

    • em2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      “The boy’s 47-year-old father, Will McDonald, faces a charge of criminal homicide and possession of a firearm by a prohibited person, according to police.”

      Doesn’t look like he’s even supposed to be a gun owner.

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It doesn’t matter, the pro-gun community will hook them up with either private sales that don’t require a background check or an infinite supply of poorly secured firearms.

        After all, executing your family shouldn’t just be for legal gun owners.

    • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      And, statistically, they are correct.

      I’m anti lax US gun laws btw. But the amount of gun owners to gun deaths/incidents still demonstrates that most are ‘responsible’ owners. Even if I still think far far far too many needless gun incidents happen, it’s not the majority or even vaguely close.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        Keep in mind that the vast majority of irresponsible acts do not result in natural consequences out of sheer luck. Like most accidental discharges while cleaning don’t hit another person. Most unsecured firearms don’t result in kids accidentally killing one another.

        The level of negligent behavior is much higher than homicide stats would have you believe.

        • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Totally. But is anyone honestly suggesting that over 50% of all owners have had an accidental discharge?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Statistics also say that the self-defense argument is largely bullshit: you’re more likely to harm those closest to you than to defend yourself with a firearm

        • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes, I fully agree. It’s well supported with data. As is my statement.

          I’m honestly confused how people took my comment to be pro gun at all. I just don’t like misrepresenting data.

        • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not sure I understand. Are you trying to say that 100% of irresponsible gun owners are also gun owners? Well, yeah… that’s definitely correct.

          Or am I missing something?

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Or am I missing something?

            The bit about what happens when people who believe themselves to be responsible are wrong.

            If you’re just going to defend mass gun ownership at me, waste someone else’s time.

            • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m not defending mass gun ownership at all and was completely clear about that in the initial comment. And I certainly am aware that all people who end up accidentally shooting themselves did not plan to do so… and I never suggested otherwise.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        And the majority of nuclear bomb owning nations are the same. Only one country has used them in wartime. 77 years of responsible nuke ownership. That doesn’t mean I want more nations to have them.