• Atrabiliousaurus@reddthat.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a percentage of world population that’s comparable to like 477,000 people dying at a football game today. Or possibly 1 million people, depending on what population estimate you use.

  • Izzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder if the numbers were exaggerated. I find it hard to believe they counted the bodies accurately.

    • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do you find it difficult to believe that humans two thousand years ago could clount? Eratosthenes calculated the axial tilt of the damn planet three hundred years prior.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        They could count, but they also tended to enormously overestimate how many people died. See for example this Wikipedia article. There’s also this article which looks like it would be interesting but I can’t get the full text of it:

        “I do not think anyone in his senses would accept that!” Remarks on Numbers of Fallen Soldiers in Roman Historiography and commentarii

  • nxfsi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    20k in the year of our Lord Jesus Christ + 27 is probably half the fucking population of the entire city

  • veroxii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Atilius was “banished” by the senate. I’m guessing banished to partake in someone else’s gladiatorial games.

    By Jupiter’s cock!