• BolexForSoup@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The problem with Starfield is, I think a lot of us expected Bethesda to take a big step forward, and they dropped a B to B+ game.

    Sure, we can blame hype, but it’s not like they didn’t contribute to it. And dropping right after BG3 certainly didn’t help.

    Credit where credit is due though. It’s definitely the most stable release they have dropped on day one by a large margin. I commend them for that.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And honestly? Rightfully so! They made a game that would’ve been incredibly impressive 5 to 8 years ago. Their peers outdid them. And peers is generous. This is Bethesda bankrolled by Microsoft to make a system seller competing with a reputation-battered CDPR and Larian Studios, the latter of which most people had never heard of until recently.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where did Bethesda overhype?

      They marketed it as Skyrim in Space and delivered it exactly like that.

      Most overhyping happened because of the players.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I am not getting bogged down in interpreting their words. They absolutely acted like this is the next big leap forward, and it really wasn’t. If you don’t agree with that that’s fine it’s an opinion. One that i think is wrong, but an opinion nonetheless.

        Though I do think it bears mentioning that I highly doubt they they literally meant “a 12 year old game, but in space.” If that’s your bar then yeah it’s a noticeable improvement.