I guess, but you kinda look like a dumbass quoting something incorrectly. You shouldnt need an in depth thread to explain why your false quote maybe technically could possibly be misconstrued.
Makes everything else you said look suspect by comparison.
That has nothing to do with what you or the other dude said. You mocked the other comment for, by your claim, saying europe has no immigrants.
The existence of immigrants in the US, regardless of if you think there are more or less of them than europe, isnt a statement on the existence of immigrants at all in europe.
Where in your quote does it say europe has no immigrants?
I refer you to the other thread for an in depth explanation.
Id just refer you back to the quote, that blatantly doesnt say what you said it does
Draw by repetition!
I guess, but you kinda look like a dumbass quoting something incorrectly. You shouldnt need an in depth thread to explain why your false quote maybe technically could possibly be misconstrued.
Makes everything else you said look suspect by comparison.
You really think I’m going to go 13 rounds with yet another provincial ignoramus in the dead end of a deleted comment’s thread?
You slapped down a quote and then said, “so, theres that.”
About a quote that explicitly does not say “that.”
And then called the dude a racist.
Disagreements about which landmass is more culturally diverse is one thing, but youre the ignoramus here, steed.
So tell me, who are the “immigrants” in the US? Who are the “not immigrants”?
That has nothing to do with what you or the other dude said. You mocked the other comment for, by your claim, saying europe has no immigrants.
The existence of immigrants in the US, regardless of if you think there are more or less of them than europe, isnt a statement on the existence of immigrants at all in europe.
Did you read what you wrote?