• muddi [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Earth and the Federation was communism. Admittedly an idealist version of it, came about because it was voted in by enlightened voters. But even then the Bell Riots showed that it was capitalism that caused conditions to arise in which the oppressed rose up against the failures of capitalism, and finally end it.

    Not sure if you specifically meant something about Mao, but at least be aware of this. It’s the most basic theory of communism that capitalism fails, turns into barbarism, and the working class have no option but to revolt to resolve the crisis.

    • nxdefiant@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Star trek doesn’t really have a working class though, they achieved Marx’s earlier hypothesised state of the deprecation of manual labor (in the technical sense). Interestingly, most of the philosophy is around how to get to Star Trek, where Star Trek itself is kind of the biggest thought experiment we have for what we would do once we’re there.

      Marx later evolved to believe only a revolution would destroy capitalism, and that’s what Mao focused on, the getting there. Through violence.

      Mao took that to heart, and succeeded, despite his best efforts, in ultimately setting the stage for a China that’s more capitalist than it’s ever been.

      That’s kind of the magic of star trek. Theres a violent past, a billion deaths, and it isn’t a new political system or a different economy that changes everything, it was a newfound hope that things could be better if people were better, and they worked together to make that happen.

      I think younger Marx would have loved Star Trek. I’m not sure about older Marx or Mao.

    • ChicagoTransplant@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I mean specifically that Mao killed millions of people through a combination of ineptitude and taking the lessons from the wars he fought in into government. The Federation is built on principles that run counter to Maoism in important respects like allowing differences of opinion and anti-authoritarianism.

      • muddi [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Federation is built on principles that run counter to Maoism in important respects like allowing differences of opinion and anti-authoritarianism.

        Do you know what the “mass line” concept by Mao is?

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        like allowing differences of opinion and anti-authoritarianism

        Getting steamrolled by nazis after inviting them to the table under pompous pretenses of “allowing differences of opinion” isn’t even a viable starter for a government. The Weimar Republic comes to mind.

        The in-setting excuse for why the Federation survived at all, shaky as it was, is that it employs cryptofascists already and gives them unchecked privileges to surveil, harm, and murder on a whim to maintain the status quo: Section 31. You might be a fan.