• Uglyhead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly thankful that most of these installations were hardened after 9/11.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      these facilities were already hard-core protected, long before 9/11. i grew up next to one, the security described that stopped this guy existed, and was in use 40+ years ago

      post 9/11 actions didnt do shit to help anyone, anywhere… it was full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        They did beef up the cabin doors to the flight crew, so they did one thing based on what actually happened on 9/11.

        • pdxfed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, thicker cabin doors on planes with trillions spent on security theater and invading places that didn’t cause 9/11, unlike the 15/19 hijackers from Saudi Arabia.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the UK they took the bins away for a bit, but then it got annoying so they brought them back, and added an announcement to say basically that if you see a terrorist being a terrorist you should probably tell someone, thank you.

          That’ll stop them.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They were hardened as they were built in the 70s, 80s, and 90s. They all pretty much have 30 foot thick concrete walls in the containment building that houses the reactor(s). The Nuclear Regulatory Commission doesn’t want something like Chernobyl to happen, which had no containment building, just a normal structure. Even if a US reactor goes supercritical and melts down, there is about a <1% chance of any radiation leaking out. If the reactor exploded the building would withstand the explosion and vent the pressure into the atmosphere, which may contain small amounts of radioactive alpha and beta particles. The only nuclear accident we’ve ever had was Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania and that was because the safety valve in the containment building got stuck open after venting the pressure after one of the reactors went critical.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even three mile island wasn’t as bad as most people seem to think. It was used as an Anti-nuclear propoganda piece, but it wasn’t that bad. The other reactors there continued operating for several decades after, though I think they’re now all shut down.

        (This is true for Chernobyl too though, so I guess it really doesn’t say a whole lot about severity.)

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There was practically zero impact to the surrounding environment after the TMI leak, I think I read that radiation was practically undetectable after like 6 months.

          This is not true for Chernobyl though. That place is fucked and they needed to encase the reactor building twice in order to stop it from leaking harmful radioactive particles (x-ray and gamma particles, alpha and beta particles are less worrisome but still harmful in large doses IIRC). Pripyat is still hot and will be for like a hundred years or more, tons of people died either immediately after the explosion or shortly thereafter. Those that didn’t die within the first few months developed serious health issues and cancers years later. It’s literally the worst nuclear disaster in history.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most of what the Three Mile Island accident did was use up half the power plant. Problem is it spooked a lot of folks, partially due to unfortunate timing. The movie The China Syndrome had recently come out, and a lot of people expected it to go as bad as that.

          It really didn’t help when the Soviets blew the roof off a reactor seven years later.

  • downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    unless you’re trying to save hostages, you should probably never ram your car through anything near a nuclear reactor. this is just one mans opinion. it’s a free country.

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The man then drove into nearby Pickens County and pulled onto some property, where shots were fired. Sheriff’s office investigators said they don’t know who fired shots, but neither security officers nor deputies used their weapons.

    I guess the trees were exercising their second amendment rights.

    Edit: from another source

    Investigators determined that they were warning shots fired by a property owner on Jones Mill Road, the news release says. No shots were fired by security officers or law enforcement during the incident.