• Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    We prefer metric mostly, but so much of our stuff comes from or is sold to the states, so we don’t have much choice but to use both systems.

    Anoying af.

        • ThanksUllr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          While this is true, they still manage to use different metric units than the rest of the damn world (e.g. mg/dL instead of mmol/L)! Really messes up a lot of our reference material.

          • paganini@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s also weird stuff how things like fuel consumption is measured. In the US we use “miles per gallon” which makes sense in a non-metric country. I was born in a metric country where we used “kilometers per liter” which also makes sense. But then cars have this setting for European countries where they show “liters per 100km”. WTF? Who in the hell measures things like that and why?

            TL;DR it’s possible to do stupid things with any measuring system.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Canada here we always use Litres per 100km, because it shows fuel consumption per a static , rather than distance being the variable value. It seems odd, but when you are doing certain math on range and fuel usage it actually makes more sense. there are articles that can explain it better than I can